proposal-bind-operator
proposal-class-fields
proposal-bind-operator | proposal-class-fields | |
---|---|---|
8 | 27 | |
1,738 | 1,616 | |
0.2% | - | |
0.0 | 1.8 | |
over 6 years ago | over 2 years ago | |
HTML | ||
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-bind-operator
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
There was also a different proposal that allows objects to be extended: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-bind-operator
Personally, I don't use classes much, but sometimes I think free functions a little bit hard to find, so I tend to experiment with the following pattern.
interface User { … }
const User = {
- Why Would Anyone Need JavaScript Generator Functions?
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Yangi bind operatori Function.prototype.bind ni yanada elegant tarzda ishlatish imkonini beruvchi yangi sintaksis
-
JavaScript tutorials
In modern JS, you can export each function directly without putting them in an object. It also allows you to call a function with a specific “this” value, function.bind(object)(args). As a matter of fact, there’s a syntax proposal proposal and to do exactly this, object::function(args). This proposal could make what you describe pretty popular.
-
Can't wrap my head around a thing about modules
Hey, not yet ;)
-
10+ Interesting ECMAScript Proposals
This binding syntax (::)
-
I've used the pipe() function 2,560 times and I can tell you it's good!
You'd need 4 periods.
-
[AskJS] Sensible Prototype Extensions?
I don't think you want realms so much as protocols or extensions, the latter assimilating the beloved bind operator.
proposal-class-fields
-
Why is nobody talking about how much Proxies break Vue 3?
Private methods: Pretty simple to explain, private methods and fields straight up do not work with ES6 proxies, its a known issue https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/106
-
JS private class fields considered harmful
The #x syntax is ugly and many people don't like it. But if you understand how JavaScript works, you'll see that private x is not possible. Some comments on the proposal suggested private #x and there were plenty of other suggestions as well, it may be interesting to read through those discussions.
- Field declarations overwrite properties on the prototype
- Turning “hard private” into “soft private”
-
All JavaScript and TypeScript features of the last 3 years explained
> - # private... not sure why they didn't just use the "private" keyword, but I don't care. I almost always use TypeScript anyways
One of the reasons was to allow private and public fields of the same name, so that subclasses are free to add own public fields without accidentally discovering private fields. There were many more considerations that went into the design: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/blob/main/PRIV....
There was a heated debate about this and the choice of the # sigil back in 2015 at the time private fields were being designed: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14.
- ES2022 Features!
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Private class fieldlari va nihoyat classlarda access modifierlarni (private,static) qo'llash imkonini beruvchi sintaksis.
-
Create Ref using React.createRef without using constructor in React?
class App extends React.Component { constructor(props) { super(props); this.state = { counter: 0 }; }} but due to Babel's class-field support, I don't use it anymore
-
Correct use of arrow functions in React
I am using ReactJS with Babel and Webpack and using ES6 as well as the proposed class fields for arrow functions. I understand that arrow functions make things more efficient by not recreating the functions each render similar to how binding in the constructor works. However, I am not 100% sure if I am using them correctly. The following is a simplified section of my code in three different files.
-
React component design patterns for 2022
Working with constructor and calling super() before we can set state. Although this has been solved with the introduction of class fields in JavaScript, Hooks still provide a simpler API
What are some alternatives?
proposal-generator-arrow-functions - ECMAScript proposal: Generator Arrow Functions
proposal-private-methods - Private methods and getter/setters for ES6 classes
proposal-relative-indexing-method - A TC39 proposal to add an .at() method to all the basic indexable classes (Array, String, TypedArray)
cross-project-council - OpenJS Foundation Cross Project Council
proposal-observable - Observables for ECMAScript
proposal-decorators - Decorators for ES6 classes
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
proposals - Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
proposal-temporal - Provides standard objects and functions for working with dates and times.
notes - TC39 meeting notes
proposal-as-patterns - `as` destructuring patterns