Pritunl VS helmfile

Also check Pritunl

It doesn't run on OpnSense but Pritunl's paid version supports Google SSO. Works well. Easy client deploy.

https://pritunl.com/ Might do the trick for you.

Went to pritunl. Self-hosted.

Thanks! I currently run Pritunl on the cluster, but I could definitely host my resume on there as well. I could stand to learn tools like https://locust.io or Bees With Machines Guns as a load testing exercise for sure. I will dive into it!

I personally use Pritunl at home. It works quite well and is push button simple to set up for a basic configuration. https://pritunl.com/

I use Pritunl. Very simple to install and manage. And its free https://pritunl.com/

Pritunl

Pritunl has been pretty good for me. OpenVPN performance is pretty solid and it's really easy to configure and manage users.

Wireguard is UDP natively, do use the TCP option in OpenVPN. It installed easily. Here’s one tool that makes installation and management easy https://pritunl.com/

What we’re going to install into the newly created AKS cluster is located in the helm directory. The descriptive Helmfile approach enables us to define applications and their settings in the helmfile.yaml file.

Is there any alternative to https://github.com/roboll/helmfile you are currently using in your company.

Interesting, I have approached this problem using Helmfile (https://github.com/roboll/helmfile) to define a “platform release package.”

To make managing the Helm deployments a little easier I used helmfile (https://github.com/roboll/helmfile).

But in general it's always easier to keep things quite separated. Meaning in separate helm releases. If you want to be able to manage things "together" at will, then you can use helmfile ( https://github.com/roboll/helmfile )

I agree; helm is too declarative.

Whenever I can, I use helmfile[0] for storing variables for helm since it does add a declarative layer on top of helm.

0 - https://github.com/roboll/helmfile

I went through the Helmfile repo Readme to figure out the difference between helmfile sync and helmfile apply. It seems like unlike the apply command, the sync command doesn't do a diff and helm upgrades the hell out of all releases 😃. But from the word sync, you'd expect the command to apply those releases that have been changed. There is also mention of the potential application of helmfile apply to periodically syncing of releases. Why not use helmfile sync for this purpose? Overall, the difference didn't become crystal clear, and I though there could probably be more to it. So, I'm asking.

helmfile is something i’ve used in the past for this https://github.com/roboll/helmfile

I always felt like dependencies in helm are for very simple non-coupled packages. I many times use Helmfile (https://github.com/roboll/helmfile) to manage dependencies instead of banging my head with vanilla Helm.

Once you do that, learn to create dynamic helm charts that use go templating and conditionals: https://github.com/roboll/helmfile