prisma1 VS graphql

I was surprised to see Prisma (a js library) listed, digging more I found out that they indeed had an Scala project which is now archived https://github.com/prisma/prisma1

For more: https://github.com/prisma/prisma1/issues/3830

Hey there, I'm Nikolas from the Prisma team. Just came here to quickly clarify this notion:

> Prisma is an API server that puts a GraphQL API in front of a DB.

Prisma is an ORM which generates a JavaScript/TypeScript client library for your database.

Your description is very true for Prisma 1 (which has been in maintenance mode for several years and is officially deprecated by now [1]), but the latest version(s) of Prisma (v2+) don't expose a GraphQL API any more. Prisma 1 also used GraphQL SDL for data modeling, the Prisma ORM on the other hand has its own, custom modeling language for describing database schemas in a declarative way and also comes with a flexible migration system.

That being said (and as Jens also mentioned elsewhere), the Prisma ORM does use GraphQL _internally_ as a wire protocol. However, as a developer, you _never_ touch this internal GraphQL layer and are not even supposed to be aware of it (you actually have to jump through a lot of hoops to even "find" it). It's also very likely that we'll replace GraphQL as a wire protocol in the future, so "GraphQL" really isn't something you should be thinking about as a developer who is using Prisma.

Hope that clarifies the situation a bit, let me know if you have any further questions around this topic.

[1] https://github.com/prisma/prisma1/issues/5208

Could you clarify this? Are you referring to the old Prisma 1 Cloud or the new Prisma Data Platform?

First released in 2019, Prisma is the newest ORM of the four we discussed. It will need time to get to a more mature state. Recently, the release of version 3 introduced a few breaking changes. There are also some existing issues noted in GitHub, such as that it does not support some Postgres column types.

Mongoose is quite a standard also open-source, but Prisma is an emerging modern solution that seems to take the cake.

Well, here comes Blitz, the agnostic monolith. Take the database, for example - Blitz comes out-of-the-box with Prisma 2. However, you're free to switch to another one like Fauna or DynamoDB. The same goes for the configuration; deciding a folder structure, defining routing conventions, selecting a styling library, and adding authorization and authentication are all set up by default, but that doesn't mean you cannot go your own way.

There is also a RealWorld port (Rakkas implementation of the RealWorld specification), a simple but complete fullstack application demonstrating how to approach building a REST API, accessing your database (via Prisma), handling authentication, testing, and more.

If you're into Typescript and prefer a code-first approach when working with databases, you'll be happy to learn about Prisma! Prisma is a next-generation Node.js and TypeScript ORM, that allows you to define a schema using a dedicated DSL so that you can then have all the comforts of modern development environments like intellisense, static type checking, automatic scaffolding and more.

It is a frontend framework, but with API routes and ORMs like https://www.prisma.io/ , you could use it as a complete stack in traditional sense I suppose.

My memory is fuzzy, but...

1. all data flow through the rails app (no pre-signed s3 upload or download links for direct uploading).

2. no support for CDNs (I think newer rails versions added support)

3. blobs and attachments were unnecessary abstractions.

3a. Querying was annoying and easy to add n+1 queries.

3b. Images are moderated and it was unclear where to put the moderation metadata (on blobs? attachments? create a new table? why so many tables?). Accessing the data was annoying (you need extra joins).

4. GraphQL gem didn't support it: https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/1777

In our Rails application, we use the popular graphql Ruby gem to resolve GraphQL queries. When used naively, it essentially resolves queries as a depth-first tree traversal, which leads to the N+1 problem in GraphQL.

If you're comfortable on the react/client side with graphql, I'd highly recommend plugging in https://graphql-ruby.org/

We use GraphQL, and Ruby GraphQL doesn't allow you to stream the result, it buffers it before sending back the request and there are no alternative. See my issue https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/3969 -- Sadly there is only one library for GraphQL in Ruby.

graphql-ruby is a Ruby gem that implements the GraphQL specification and functionalities.

The next step is to add the GraphQL gem to our Gemfile; you can visit its page, graphql-ruby, for more details; now, open your Gemfile and add this line:

If you do go the API route though, strongly consider using GraphQL with the (graphql-ruby)[https://graphql-ruby.org/] gem.

GraphQL saves you time designing versioned REST endpoints. It self documents. Documentation isn't optional for serious web development so this is a huge win. The rails gems have gotten really good at picking up associations as well since I looked into a couple years ago. https://graphql-ruby.org

When it comes to implementing a GraphQL server in Rails, one can use the excellent GraphQL Ruby gem.