ports VS firejail

I think OpenBSD comes the closest to what you want with its two easy to use syscalls that provide syscall filtering and restricting access to paths:

https://man.openbsd.org/pledge.2

https://man.openbsd.org/unveil.2

A few random examples:

https://github.com/tmux/tmux/blob/c8494dff7b6b9a996866edaf8c...

https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/master/www/mozilla-fir...

https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/master/www/mozilla-fir...

To get the best isolation you need to patch the source — the application needs to go through initial setup and then drop privileges to the absolute possible minimum. But it's easy to make custom wrappers for third-party applications — the above profiles taken from the OpenBSD ports tree are the proof.

Have you checked the no-ip port: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/master/net/no-ip/pkg/noip2.rc

> https://github.com/openbsd/ports/commit/bf33ea5f3ff390d8cde3...

Now, this is surprising. I randomly clicked on that link and I immediately see that the code and the patch has a bug. It only checks the first 8 characters:

    -      if (gr != NULL && strncmp(gr->gr_name, "operator", 8) == 0)

Some people are working around this by using obsdfreqd, some by patching sys/kern/sched_bsd.c (change if (hw_power) to if (0 && hw_power)), some by simply setting to a lower speed (sysctl hw.perfpolicy=manual and hw.setperf=99 might be enough as this disables turbo mode found on some CPUs).

You could also look into a port that has a hard dependency on openssl like: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/tree/master/security/sslscan

For me it's the ease of management and good documentation.

For example, during 6.8 to 6.9 upgrade, there was a major postgresql upgrade.

It is mentioned in the doc https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade69.html (see Special packages at the bottom).

You're redirected to the package README with special instructions on how to setup and upgrade: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/blob/master/databases/postg...

Et voilà, everything is explained.

On debian, if I am not careful, I'll do an upgrade and risk breaking something during a db migration (I'm looking at you MySQL upgrades...).

Godot engine gamecontroller support. This is limited and incomplete, but it's a start. A huge number of indie games made with Godot are released every week; most of which work at least partially with an XBox {360,One} controller. You can follow This Week in Godot if you're interested.

> OpenBSD has handled this case for some years. I do not know if there was any breakage or fallout from this.

The other thing about OpenBSD is that when they make a change to their OS, they also go through to make sure all the (third-party) ports/packages:

* https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/ports/

* https://github.com/openbsd/ports

do not break. So they're create patches for the software and and submit them upstream.

bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.

Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.

If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail

Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail

Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.

I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:

```

Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/

Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case

Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.

This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...

TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.

Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.

Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).

Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":

Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc

What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?