latte
cve-rs
| latte | cve-rs | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | |
| 169 | 3,584 | |
| - | - | |
| 4.1 | 8.9 | |
| about 1 month ago | 22 days ago | |
| Rust | Rust | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
latte
-
Fast memory vulnerabilities, written in 100% safe Rust
This tool is probably the fastest in its class - does this code look like having a lot of lifetimes or other cryptic syntax?
- https://github.com/pkolaczk/latte/blob/main/src/main.rs
- https://github.com/pkolaczk/latte/blob/main/src/exec.rs
There was one fundamental "aha" moment for me when it clicked: move semantics.
-
The mindless tyranny of “what if it changes?” as a software design principle
> Does https://github.com/pkolaczk/latte count?
This is just Rust code. Where is the equivalent Java code?
> Or the Optional cost described on my blog here: https://pkolaczk.github.io/overhead-of-optional/?
Why aren't you using OptionalLong[1]? You shouldn't use Optional, that's never a good choice. At any rate, nobody should be claiming Java optionals are are free, they're a high level abstraction and absolutely do not belong in hot codepaths.
In general it's fairly easy to construct benchmarks that favor any particular language, which is why you constantly see these blog posts about how high level interpreted languages (JS, Haskell) are faster than C++.
> And what do I do with that knowledge if it turns out the optimization didn't happen?
The way the JIT works is by aggressively overassuming, and then recompiling with more generalized interpretations of the code when assumptions turn out to be false. But the wider problems of compilers occasionally generating suboptimal instructions isn't something that is Java specific.
[1] https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/docs/api/java.base...
-
Async Rust in Practice: Performance, Pitfalls, Profiling
A few weeks ago, an interesting issue appeared on our GitHub tracker. It was reported that, despite our care in designing the driver to be efficient, it proved to be unpleasantly slower than one of the competing drivers, cassandra-cpp, which is a Rust wrapper of a C++ CQL driver. The author of latte, a latency tester for Cassandra (and Scylla), pointed out that switching the back-end from cassandra-cpp to scylla-rust-driver resulted in an unacceptable performance regression. Time to investigate!
cve-rs
-
Mark Russinovich: "There is industry consensus on moving away from C/C++"
When there is industry consensus, there is often much humour that precedes it, including https://github.com/Speykious/cve-rs
-
Fast memory vulnerabilities, written in 100% safe Rust
What a wonderful license! https://github.com/Speykious/cve-rs/blob/main/LICENSE
What are some alternatives?
ScyllaDB Async Rust Driver - Async CQL driver for Rust, optimized for ScyllaDB
FizzBuzzEnterpris
FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition - FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a no-nonsense implementation of FizzBuzz made by serious businessmen for serious business purposes.