stun VS webtorrent

Compare stun vs webtorrent and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
stun webtorrent
3 80
567 29,023
3.2% 0.5%
6.8 9.0
23 days ago 1 day ago
Go JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

stun

Posts with mentions or reviews of stun. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-29.
  • NAT behaviour discovery using STUN
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2022
  • WebTorrent
    14 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2022
    This isn't true.

    In 2017 appear.in published some numbers. They saw ~15% were not able to do P2P. https://medium.com/@fippo/what-kind-of-turn-server-is-being-...

    Reading your stackoverflow link my guess is that you aren't using STUN. A P2P connection can't be established without a NAT hole punch.

    Also if possible I would avoid the terms `Full-cone NAT` and `Symmetric NAT` they don't do a good job of describing what is actually happening. NAT Mapping/NAT Filtering is the best way to describe it. I wrote a little bit about it here [0]. To see what type of NAT you have try stun-nat-behaviour[1]

    [0] https://webrtcforthecurious.com/docs/03-connecting/#nat-mapp...

    [1] https://github.com/pion/stun/tree/master/cmd/stun-nat-behavi...

  • How to make communicating two machines which are behind their respective NATs with wireguard
    1 project | /r/WireGuard | 26 Sep 2022
    If you test your NAT on the destination via a tool like https://github.com/pion/stun/tree/master/cmd/stun-nat-behaviour, what does it report for mapping and filtering?

webtorrent

Posts with mentions or reviews of webtorrent. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-18.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stun and webtorrent you can also consider the following projects:

webrtc-echoes - Simple useful interoperability tests for WebRTC libraries. If you are a WebRTC library developer we'd love to include you!

peerflix - Streaming torrent client for node.js

aquatic - High-performance open BitTorrent tracker (UDP, HTTP, WebTorrent)

ipfs - IPFS implementation in JavaScript

buffer - The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.

instant.io - 🚀 Streaming file transfer over WebTorrent (torrents on the web)

simple-peer - 📡 Simple WebRTC video, voice, and data channels

webtorrent-mpv-hook - Adds a hook that allows mpv to stream torrents

werift-webrtc - WebRTC Implementation for TypeScript (Node.js), includes ICE/DTLS/SCTP/RTP/SRTP/WEBM/MP4

webtorrent-desktop - ❤️ Streaming torrent app for Mac, Windows, and Linux

trystero - 🤝 Build instant multiplayer webapps, no server required — Magic WebRTC matchmaking over BitTorrent, Nostr, MQTT, IPFS, and Firebase

bittorrent-dht - 🕸 Simple, robust, BitTorrent DHT implementation