ice
turn
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ice
-
NetBird raises €1.1M – Open-Source P2P WireGuard-based overlay network
Heads up to folks from Pion https://github.com/pion/ice.
Sixth, NetBird supports MFA and popular OpenID-compliant Identity Providers (IdP) like MS Azure, Okta, Google, Auth0, Keycloak, Zitadel, Authentik, etc. Available in the self-hosted version as well.
Seventh, NetBird is a European company headquartered in Berlin, Germany. Hence this might interest local European companies looking for local networking platforms.
Eighth, NetBird joined the CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security incubator - the #1 cybersecurity research university. The program gives us direct access to cutting-edge research that we will use to optimize the technology.
-
If you ever struggled setting up Wireguard with peers behind NAT and without a public ip
Basically yes. The difference would be that we are trying to use more open source technologies and libraries instead of implementing our own. For example pion/ice from the WebRTC project and coturn for STUN and TURN. Both ice and coturn are used to go around NAT. We lack a peer management system that will allow to add peers dynamically. Tailscale and Zero tier have it but not open sourced. We plan to implement such a system and open source it.
turn
-
Show HN: An Almost Free, Open Source Turn Server
I see a couple ways to combat that.
* Your TURN server should provide APIs that allow you to verify that allocations/permissions are only created for your users.
* Use an auth mechanism that has an expiry time. Like [0]
[0] https://github.com/pion/turn/tree/master/examples/lt-cred-ge...
-
Using WebTransport
> dedicated signalling
For my small projects I run my HTTP + WebRTC in the same server. My signaling is one POST. Maybe I am missing the complexity, but I don't feel any additional pain compared to running any network service?
> STUN Karate
Mind explaining more? I use https://github.com/pion/turn and run my STUN server embedded in my HTTP server. I do do anything but point my `PeerConnection` at `my-service.com`
-
Show HN: Weron – A Peer-to-Peer VPN Based on WebRTC Written in Go
There is a very neat implementation of a TURN from Pion
https://github.com/pion/turn
-
How do I deploy a TURN server for WebRTC apps on heroku?
I've tried node-turn in a node.js server, tried to execute pion/turn binaries directly so far but with no luck. `node-turn` works if I run locally and test it with my public ip address but the same doesn't work on heroku.
What are some alternatives?
bot_box - Universal remote control for robots. Works via the internet.
livekit-server - Scalable, high-performance WebRTC SFU. SDKs in JavaScript, React, React Native, Flutter, Swift, Kotlin, Unity/C#, Go, Ruby and Node. [Moved to: https://github.com/livekit/livekit]
coturn - coturn TURN server project
stun - Fast RFC 5389 STUN implementation in go
meepo - Connect to your service without public IP in p2p channel