phoenix
pulsar
Our great sponsors
phoenix | pulsar | |
---|---|---|
12 | 91 | |
1,288 | 2,923 | |
12.9% | 4.4% | |
9.9 | 9.9 | |
1 day ago | 7 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
phoenix
-
10 amazing tools based on AI
- Code Builder: [Here](Phoenix Code)
-
Ask HN: Do you use a cloud dev environment?
As somebody involved with the team developing a GUI desktop editor... no not really. Outside of the very, very occasional use of the VSCode integrated into GitHub (like you mention - even then most of the time I just use the standard GH editor). I just don't really have a need for it.
Saying that I do quite like the Phoenix project (https://phcode.dev/) and I know some people like using GitPod but personally I don't really "get it" over just having everything local where I can use any tool I want that I have at my disposal on my system.
-
Not Saving Local Files
This is an error we have not encountered before, please update this issue with console logs/errors in dev tools for me to take a look: https://github.com/phcode-dev/phoenix/issues/1041
-
Issue with Program and extensions
You could use the in browser version at https://phcode.dev if the main use ia beautify. It has beautify out of the box and is a lot more newer version than Brackets is at.
- Brackets Web- Phoenix IDE 3.0 Web Release Is Out
-
Brackets Web- Phoenix IDE 3.0 Web Release is out.
Phoenix marks the first large-scale, truly independent release from the Brackets community. Entirely homegrown within the community, it is also the largest engineering effort put into Brackets since 2015 (including Adobe).
-
Using Phone to run VS Code
Maybe try Brackets, it has an online version called Phoenix
- Atom Was Archived Today
-
How do you install Brackets on Linux currently?
You could use phcode.dev in the browser in Linux till we have native builds available.
- Atom editor being retired - new editor recs?
pulsar
-
Show HN: Open-source alternatives to tools You pay for
You may be thinking of Pulsar (<https://pulsar-edit.dev/>)?
- Python Text Editor
- Armed with a big ol' can of Raid: Pulsar 1.110.0 is available now!
-
Open-Source Washing
> VSCodium is not "designed" to be less functional, since it is a project maintained by developers who are unaffiliated with Microsoft.
In today's (OSS) world, employment or affiliation doesn't matter much. Microsoft can propose what they want and get what they want from the project, at the end of the day. I don't think these independent maintainers have power to say "No" (if a VSCodium developer can chime in here, I'd love to be stand corrected), or they risk VSCodium to be forked to VSCodiumX, by developers who are friendlier to the megacorp which loves Linux.
Yes, VSCodium is a node to Chromium. "-ium" has a ring akin to "-ish" in today's conjecture. Freemium - Free-ish but not. Chromium - Chrome-ish but not. VSCodium - VSCode-ish, but not. This might be curse in the naming, but it feels like that, at least for me.
The blog post I linked quotes a tweet which supports what I'm saying, heck even the blog post does a much better job of detailing what I was trying to say here in my previous comments.
To circle back, the problem with -ium projects are, they are effectively banned from participating in the main ecosystem which drives these projects forward, and to be in "The Ecosystem", you need to use the closed source versions with pervasive data collection and whatnot. Heck, even Google abuses Chromium with "Experiments and Proposals", which they use to politely yet forcefully push the web to the places they want. VSCodium is the same getaway drug and test vessel for Microsoft.
Lure with Open Source version, trap with closed source version for "Full Benefits" (for the company, because user is the product).
> You're entitled to your own opinion, but Atom was developed by GitHub...
Yes & yes.
> which was acquired by Microsoft.
Yes.
> It doesn't help that Atom was discontinued last year, with the final version having been released in March 2022
However, it's forked as Pulsar [0], which I meant by "current form" in my previous comment. Again, it's MIT licensed, and that's not my favorite, but at least it's not a company editor now.
Atom's original developers started to build Zed, which is worst of both worlds currently (Open source with a closed backend, plus "All your data belong to us" clause).
At the end of the day, from my perspective "-ium" projects and their sanitized versions are just open-core versions of the "main tools" developed from them.
Just because these versions somehow work, and have a permissive license doesn't make them open source in the meta sense. Pedantically they are open source software, yes, but they are just the "Open Core" or Demo/Shareware versions of the tools which companies use to strange to ecosystems.
This is just enshittification of open source in my eyes.
More power to you if you're happy with the -ium tools, but I'd rather use truly free software (Like Eclipse), or use completely honest closed source software (like BBEdit), instead of using tools designed to look like open source but not.
[0]: https://pulsar-edit.dev/
-
Chime – Capable. Focused. Fast. An open source editor for macOS
I thought spiritual successor to Atom is Pulsar. https://github.com/pulsar-edit/pulsar
-
Help: Atom Alternatives/Copy-Pasting Scripts
Pulsar has a TTS package, for those who were very comfortable in Atom.
-
Libre-friendly IDEs?
In addition to the already mentioned Emacs, I would check Pulsar, the Atom successor.
-
Im new to lua, what are the best Lua IDE?
Community-led fork of Atom
-
Clarification question
Also, don't worry - we understand that there's documentation lacking on the "extend Pulsar" part and on package creation, but we're working on it. We're also working on better ways to test, document, and create packages (and grammars - see, for example, how we usually tested grammars in the past and how we're migrating to for example), so it's just a matter of time, really.
-
Best FOSS text editor like atom?
Our website is https://pulsar-edit.dev/, feel free to check out or Discord server if you want to come and say hi or have any questions - we are a friendly bunch.
What are some alternatives?
Brackets - An open source code editor for the web, written in JavaScript, HTML and CSS.
Visual Studio Code - Visual Studio Code
brackets - An open source code editor for the web, written in JavaScript, HTML and CSS.
hydrogen - :atom: Run code interactively, inspect data, and plot. All the power of Jupyter kernels, inside your favorite text editor.
codeit - Mobile code editor connected to Git.
micro-editor - A modern and intuitive terminal-based text editor
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
vscodium - binary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing
lite-xl - A lightweight text editor written in Lua
Launch.nvim - 🚀 Launch.nvim is modular starter for Neovim.
Atom - :atom: The hackable text editor