pgrx VS json-api

Consider also the companies and work behind pgrx [0] and pgzx [1]:

[0] https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx

[1] https://github.com/xataio/pgzx

If you like this (I do very much), you might also like pg_idkit[0] which is a little extension with a bunch of other kinds of IDs that you can generate inside PG, thanks to the seriously awesome pgrx[1] and Rust.

[0]: https://github.com/VADOSWARE/pg_idkit

[1]: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx

(disclosure, i work at supabase and have been developing TLEs with the RDS team)

Trusted Language Extensions refer to an extension written in any trusted language. In this case Rust, but it also includes: plpgsql, plv8, etc. See [0]

> PL/Rust is a more performant and more feature-rich alternative to PL/pgSQL

This is only partially true. plpgsql has bindings to low-level Postgres APIs, so in some cases it is just as fast (or faster) than Rust.

> Building a vector index (or any index for that matter) inside Postgres is a more involved process and can not be done via the UDF interface, be it Rust, C or PL/pgSQL

Most PG Rust extensions are written with the excellent pgrx framework [1]. While it doesn't have index bindings right now, I can certainly imagine a future where this is possible[2].

All that said - I think there are a lot of hoops to jump through right now and I doubt it's worth it for the Latern team. I think they are right to focus on developing a separate C extension

[0] TLE: https://supabase.com/blog/pg-tle

[1] pgrx: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx

[2] https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx/issues/190#issue...

I’m currently playing with PostgreSQL, foreign data wrappers, and pgrx rust extensions. My development experience has been surprisingly smooth and enjoyable.

My main issue is that joins will be processed locally, so all the foreign data will be fetched before the join happens. But otherwise basic CRUD is easy.

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers

https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx

https://github.com/supabase/wrappers

I think maybe what you’re really looking for are the files here: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx/tree/c2eac033856...

Those are the internals we currently expose as unsafe “sys” bindings.

As we/contributors identify more that are desired we add them.

pgrx’ focus is on providing safe wrappers and general interfaces to the Postgres internals, which is the bulk of our work and is what will take many years.

As unsafe bindings go, we could just expose everything, and likely eventually will. There’s just some practical management concerns around doing that without a better namespace organization —- something we’ve been working.

The Postgres sources are not small. They are very complex, inconsistent in places, and often follow patterns that are specific to Postgres and not easy to generalize.

If you’ve never built an extension with pgrx, give it a shot one afternoon. It’s very exciting to see your own code running in your database.

pgrx is one of the greatest enabling innovations in the PG ecosystem in a long time.

Awesome to see so many high quality extensions come out of it.

https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx

If you're interested in what my Threadripper 3970X does with it, there's some numbers in this PR: https://github.com/tcdi/pgrx/pull/1147

In addition to saving you time on boilerplate, the API provided by Hatchify fully implements the JSON: API specification, which stipulates solid standards to define the peculiarities of CRUD REST APIs. Get back all the time spent bike-shedding how to implement standard API features like filtering, pagination, including related data, etc. JSON: API offers consistent practices for frontend and backend developers to agree on how resources are fetched and returned. Since Hatchify provides the core of your API for you, you can count on it’s standardized functionality to give your API a consistent start.

-JSON:API format responses (https://jsonapi.org) for better standardization.

Built using Ruby on Rails, Sunnybox is designed to offer a powerful yet easy-to-use solution for developers managing email systems.

I'd really appreciate your feedback on:

- The API's user-friendliness and efficiency.

https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/795

There is an atomic operations extension:

JSON:API to format each message

As we’re building a RESTful API that’s formatted by the JSON:API specification and store our data in a MySQL8 relational database, a few things were pretty straightforward – we need a new model and we’ll name it Custom Field (naming wasn’t an issue here 🥲).

I found json api spec[1] recently. This kind of is better standard for REST APIs. It is bit rough to handle client side but once you get the hang of it, it is breeze to use

[1] https://jsonapi.org/

That's it! Now we have a complete set of RESTful CRUD APIs at "/api/zen" that conforms to the JSON:API specification, and the access policies fully protect the APIs. The API provides rich filtering and relation-fetching capabilities. The following are some examples; you can find more details here.

Does this have any relation to https://jsonapi.org/ ?

Basic REST and JSON RPC are very simple to start with, but have common problems when application gets bigger. How do you represent relations, pagination, filtering etc? My go-to specification for structuring JSON documents is https://jsonapi.org/ It covers most basic needs of a standard API.