pgrx
cel-spec
pgrx | cel-spec | |
---|---|---|
13 | 9 | |
3,245 | 2,392 | |
3.3% | 2.6% | |
9.5 | 7.5 | |
6 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Rust | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pgrx
-
Building a Managed Postgres Service in Rust
Consider also the companies and work behind pgrx [0] and pgzx [1]:
[0] https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx
[1] https://github.com/xataio/pgzx
-
UUIDv7 is coming in PostgreSQL 17
If you like this (I do very much), you might also like pg_idkit[0] which is a little extension with a bunch of other kinds of IDs that you can generate inside PG, thanks to the seriously awesome pgrx[1] and Rust.
[0]: https://github.com/VADOSWARE/pg_idkit
[1]: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx
-
90x Faster Than Pgvector – Lantern's HNSW Index Creation Time
(disclosure, i work at supabase and have been developing TLEs with the RDS team)
Trusted Language Extensions refer to an extension written in any trusted language. In this case Rust, but it also includes: plpgsql, plv8, etc. See [0]
> PL/Rust is a more performant and more feature-rich alternative to PL/pgSQL
This is only partially true. plpgsql has bindings to low-level Postgres APIs, so in some cases it is just as fast (or faster) than Rust.
> Building a vector index (or any index for that matter) inside Postgres is a more involved process and can not be done via the UDF interface, be it Rust, C or PL/pgSQL
Most PG Rust extensions are written with the excellent pgrx framework [1]. While it doesn't have index bindings right now, I can certainly imagine a future where this is possible[2].
All that said - I think there are a lot of hoops to jump through right now and I doubt it's worth it for the Latern team. I think they are right to focus on developing a separate C extension
[0] TLE: https://supabase.com/blog/pg-tle
[1] pgrx: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx
[2] https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx/issues/190#issue...
-
SQL as API
I’m currently playing with PostgreSQL, foreign data wrappers, and pgrx rust extensions. My development experience has been surprisingly smooth and enjoyable.
My main issue is that joins will be processed locally, so all the foreign data will be fetched before the join happens. But otherwise basic CRUD is easy.
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx
https://github.com/supabase/wrappers
-
Postgres: The Next Generation
I think maybe what you’re really looking for are the files here: https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx/tree/c2eac033856...
Those are the internals we currently expose as unsafe “sys” bindings.
As we/contributors identify more that are desired we add them.
pgrx’ focus is on providing safe wrappers and general interfaces to the Postgres internals, which is the bulk of our work and is what will take many years.
As unsafe bindings go, we could just expose everything, and likely eventually will. There’s just some practical management concerns around doing that without a better namespace organization —- something we’ve been working.
The Postgres sources are not small. They are very complex, inconsistent in places, and often follow patterns that are specific to Postgres and not easy to generalize.
If you’ve never built an extension with pgrx, give it a shot one afternoon. It’s very exciting to see your own code running in your database.
- Pgrx – Build Postgres Extensions with Rust
-
Pg_bm25: Elastic-Quality Full Text Search Inside Postgres
pgrx is one of the greatest enabling innovations in the PG ecosystem in a long time.
Awesome to see so many high quality extensions come out of it.
https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx
- PGRX v0.9.7
- Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded (pgsql-hackers)
-
Build high-performance functions in Rust on Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
If you're interested in what my Threadripper 3970X does with it, there's some numbers in this PR: https://github.com/tcdi/pgrx/pull/1147
cel-spec
-
Apple releases Pkl – onfiguration as code language
My employer uses a combination of Protocol Buffers (for the config schema definition) and Bazel/Starlark (for concrete instantiations). Configs are validated at build time and runtime using CEL (https://github.com/google/cel-spec).
- SQL as API
- AWS Creates New Policy-Based Access Control Language Cedar
-
CEL for admission controller with ValidatingAdmissionPolicy in K8s 1.26
The Common Expression Language (CEL) implements common semantics for expression evaluation, enabling different applications to more easily interoperate. https://github.com/google/cel-spec
-
Pure Ruby implementation of Google Common Expression Language
Looks like Google invented a specification for a simple "expression language." -> https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/doc/langdef.md. Writing the expressions feels like writing Java, C++, Go, or TypeScript code. Google then released C++ and Go versions of this langauge as a library.
-
A library for evaluating expressions like Google Common Expression Language but for Java
https://github.com/google/cel-spec unfortunately, it's in Go or C++. Of course I can write a binding to them. But is there any other similar that you would know of for Java? My other course of action would be to offload computation to another service using this library in Go, or Jsonnet or Open Policy Agent/Rego based evaluation, which I'd prefer not to. Executing JS in Java via Nashorn also an option but it'd be heavy weight.
-
JsonLogic
Having a standard way to share expressions does seem quite useful, especially when it's multilingual.
[0]: https://github.com/google/cel-spec
-
Google Cloud: IAM Conditions
There's more information about CEL and its specifications here
-
Question about setting up multiple applications using nginx.
Especially when dealing with more complex match rules, I personally much prefer Caddy's matchers over building some weird-ass if constructs in Nginx. It also supports CEL for request matching, giving you access to extremely powerful logic, if you need it.
What are some alternatives?
api - 🚀 Core REST API & Gateway for Zaun
jsonlogic - Go Lang implementation of JsonLogic
plrust - A Rust procedural language handler for PostgreSQL
json-logic-js - Build complex rules, serialize them as JSON, and execute them in JavaScript
readyset - Readyset is a MySQL and Postgres wire-compatible caching layer that sits in front of existing databases to speed up queries and horizontally scale read throughput. Under the hood, ReadySet caches the results of cached select statements and incrementally updates these results over time as the underlying data changes.
json-logic-rs - JSONLogic implementation in Rust, accessible via Python and JS
mimir - ⚡ Supercharged Flutter/Dart Database
jaspr - Modern web framework for building websites in Dart. Supports SPAs and SSR.
paradedb - Postgres for Search and Analytics
secure-json-logic - Use logic-objects from uncertain sources and run them locally without breaking the own system
influxdb_iox - Pronounced (influxdb eye-ox), short for iron oxide. This is the new core of InfluxDB written in Rust on top of Apache Arrow.
jsedn - javascript implementation of edn