peds VS dsu

Or lets look at persistent data structures, a staple of functional programming:

https://github.com/tobgu/peds

Notice how you'd need to generate the DS for every type you'd like to use it, which is not the case with built in mutable maps and slices.

To make them type-safe, you need to generate them for every type you use. While this is technically possible, it does make the language quite hostile towards functional programming. With generics, this is rectified but the problem with non-composable multi-return-value functions still remains

One of the library types that benefits from having generics is "data structure" libraries. Does anyone know of work going on to make a Go 1.18+ persistent data structure library (something like this or this)?

Okay, maybe not :(

But I think you'll love this gem...

Daily stand-ups (DSU) are a drag. I get it. I personally have a hard time remembering "what I did yesterday", et al. So, I created this fun, powerful little ruby gem, called dsu to help me out. Many love it, and I think may love it too! So, if you'd like to give it a try:

Visit the dsu github wiki if you're suspicious: https://github.com/gangelo/dsu/wiki

Or go straight to rubygems.org and download if you're adventurous: https://rubygems.org/gems/dsu

Enjoy! <3 <3 <3

I love ruby and rails, but agile Daily-Stand-ups (DSU) are a bit of a pain. I have a hard time remembering "what I did yesterday". I created this powerful little ruby gem, called dsu to help me out. Many love it, and you may love it too. If you'd like to give it a try, enjoy:

Visit the dsu github wiki: https://github.com/gangelo/dsu/wiki

Straight to rubygems.org: https://rubygems.org/gems/dsu

<3

Humm. Works for me (famous last words); try again:

https://github.com/gangelo/dsu/wiki