dogecoin VS dogecoin

Unfortunately, this feature was never brought back into 1.14 (logically sound because Dogeparty died), but over the past year and a bit I did receive some requests from shibes for something like this. In private conversations when there was a concrete need, or implied as a use-case in public discussions, even as recent as a couple of days ago. So over a year ago, while we were working on 1.14.4 still, I started to re-port the feature from the special 1.10 branch into 1.14, i.e. here and have kept it up-to-date until somewhere at the start of the current 1.14.6 development work, to get a better feeling for what kind of integration issues we'll run into if I would propose this code (before worrying about potential security issues.) I run 2 nodes with this (self-compiled) software right now and I often use it when doing research towards shibes' questions about particular addresses.

I have created a branch with updated Bulgarian strings to translate and have created a quick guide on how to do this using the github website.

Many increased usability

I'm running https://github.com/patricklodder/dogecoin/tree/1.14-prune-network on mainnet with a couple of nodes. It basically allows me to provide network services from a pruned state. Keep all the up-to-date nodes in the network up-to-date, while not allowing any nodes that are far behind to connect. (And also disconnecting nodes that slow the network down.)

Have you checked the 1.14.7-dev branch on GitHub? https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin

🧾 Whitepaper

It already has the "fix" inherited from the Bitcoin code they reuse. Though you shouldn't count on that feature to not have bugs: the Dogecoin codebase is old and poorly maintained. If you run it on a cloud service, always turn on billing limits. https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/master/doc/reduce-...

Here's the release tracker for 1.14.7. We've been a little bit backed up with some work to migrate the testing system to a supported version of Ubuntu in GitHub, as well as a need for more people to do good code reviews.

read this dogecoin issue for more info (it also works with doge) https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/issues/3243