patchy VS OneByteWallhack

Compare patchy vs OneByteWallhack and see what are their differences.

patchy

:anchor: Patch the inner source of python functions at runtime. (by adamchainz)

OneByteWallhack

CS:GO wallhack achieved by patching one byte of game memory. Written in Python 3. (by danielkrupinski)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
patchy OneByteWallhack
1 3
169 161
- -
8.3 0.0
10 days ago about 1 year ago
Python Python
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

patchy

Posts with mentions or reviews of patchy. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-31.
  • I still Lisp (and you should too)
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 31 Jan 2021
    One great upside of s-expressions for me is that you can do some cool things like 'find and replace' for whole subexpressions (for monkey patching third party code, for example). I use `el-patch` [0] in my emacs config and `advice-patch` for surgically changing the default behaviors of some org-mode functions to compile my blog [1].

    That said a similar sort of thing is possible, for example, in python with `patchy` [2], and perhaps many other languages? But I guess it's not as organic as in lisps, e.g. `advice-patch` implementation is less than 100 LOC, whereas in case of python you have to rely on existing heavy lifting done by `ast` module.

    As of simple syntax, it really gets in the way sometimes, e.g. I'm always annoyed by constant quoting in Elisp because the same type of brackets (only `()`) is used. In comparison, in Clojure it's much more readable with (), [], {} (and more).

    > Lisp is not an interpreted language. It is not slow

    A bit of nitpicking, but... which Lisp? :) For example,

    > all implementations come with lots and lots of levers to tweak performance for most programs. In some cases the programs might need assistance from faster languages like C and C++ because they are closer to the hardware, but with faster hardware, even that difference is becoming irrelevant.

    Well, this is true of most languages.

    [0] https://github.com/raxod502/el-patch#el-patch

    [1] https://github.com/karlicoss/beepb00p/blob/a4fd7cb95e1705412...

    [2] https://github.com/adamchainz/patchy#patchy

OneByteWallhack

Posts with mentions or reviews of OneByteWallhack. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing patchy and OneByteWallhack you can also consider the following projects:

nvidia-patch - This patch removes restriction on maximum number of simultaneous NVENC video encoding sessions imposed by Nvidia to consumer-grade GPUs.

GOESP - Cross-platform streamproof ESP hack for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, written in modern C++. Rendering and GUI powered by Dear ImGui + FreeType.