pash VS wrk2

which a quick googling with "pash shell" gives this github link https://github.com/binpash/pash.

> This runs a benchmark for 30 seconds, using 2 threads, keeping 100 HTTP connections open, and a constant throughput of 2000 requests per second (total, across all connections combined).

Some distros include `ab`[2] which is also good, but wrk2 improves on it (and on wrk version 1) in multiple ways, so that's what I use myself.

[1] https://github.com/giltene/wrk2

[2] https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/ab.html

I've had my eyes on wrk2 [1]

1. https://github.com/giltene/wrk2

But I am curious, what does HN use? Any tips?

We used wrk2, a fantastic tool to generate stable load on the server. Wrk2 improves on wrk and adds the ability to generate sustained load at a specific rate (-R parameter).

I use tools like vegeta and wrk2 to answer those questions.

Needs (2015).

I loved the talks from Gil Tene.

I always reach for his fork of wrk whenever I need to test throughput:

https://github.com/giltene/wrk2

That's why a lot of people just use something like wrk or wrk2 (highly recommended to run it on a separate machine) and benchmark the ability to serve actual requests.

To get the most out of preload, I preloaded all files that the experimental endpoint needs to include. As a benchmarking tool, I use wrk2 — a more advanced Apache Benchmark analog — to keep it simple and provide more flexibility to generate loads similar to a real-life one.

i use https://github.com/giltene/wrk2 pretty regularly.

it has decent lua hooks to customize behavior but i use it in the dumbest way possible to hammer a server at a fixed rate with the same payload over and over.

i run it by hand after a big change to the server to make sure nothing obviously regressed. i used to run it nightly in a jenkins job but 99% of the time no one looked at results. it was nice to see if assumptions on load a single node could handle didn't hold anymore.

I use wrk2 because it overcomes coordinated omission.