papersman VS xapers

I don't use bash, as most people here I'm developing my own proglingo, but I'm a lucky one, as mine is just dialect of Python, so doing things like this is piece of cake (and I try to dogfeed all my daily needs thru my lingo). https://github.com/pfalcon/papersman

I'm exactly at that turning point. My little papersman large satisfies my own needs. But I'm starting to thinks beyond that, of how to share with other people. A particular usecase in my queue for long is cloning chrisgseaton's https://rubybib.org/ , but for Python. And for that, heck, I need DOIs. Note that in my local collection I totally don't need them, some corporate cloud identifiers, but to share with other people, yeah, they are useful. And as I don't need them, I of course not going to enter them manually. Automating is also a bit boring, it's always better when somebody did it for you. I for some time had review of xapers in my queue. That has Debian/Ubuntu packages, no idea how I missed it before (well, actually, there's idea - the project is barely maintained). My disputes with its author on what's wrong with xapers can be found at #9, #10.