papers-we-love
CppCoreGuidelines
Our great sponsors
papers-we-love | CppCoreGuidelines | |
---|---|---|
69 | 306 | |
83,329 | 41,497 | |
1.5% | 0.9% | |
3.2 | 7.6 | |
2 days ago | 10 days ago | |
Shell | Python | |
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
papers-we-love
-
The Top 10 GitHub Repositories Making Waves 🌊📊
Papers We Love (PWL) is a community built around reading, discussing and learning more about academic computer science papers. This repository serves as a directory of some of the best papers the community can find, bringing together documents scattered across the web. You can also visit the Papers We Love site for more info.
- What led you to use Linux as your daily driver?
-
We have used too many levels of abstractions and now the future looks bleak
You might find the paper Out of the Tar Pit interesting if you haven't already read it: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
The ideas and approaches you talk about evoked some of the concepts from that paper for me. It talks a lot about separating accidental complexity and infrastructure so you can focus only on what is essential to define your solutions.
- Out Of The Tar Pit (2006) [pdf]
-
John McCarthy’s collection of numerical facts for use in elisp programs
Sure he was expecting a practical language and was designing one. Lisp was from day zero a project to implement a real programming language for a computer.
Earlier he experimented with IPL and also list processing programming on Fortran. The plan was to implement a Lisp compiler. At first the Lisp code McCarthy was experimenting with, was manually translated to machine code.
Then came up the idea to use EVAL as a base for an interpreter, which was implemented by manually translating the Lisp code to machine language. Around 1962 then a compiler followed.
https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/c...
-
Python: Just Write SQL
I'm in a 4th camp: we should be writing our applications against a relational data model and _not_ marshaling query results into and out of Objects at all.
Elaborations on this approach:
- https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
- https://riffle.systems/essays/prelude/
- CS Journals and Magazines?
-
Ask HN: Incremental View Maintenance for SQLite?
The short ask: Anyone know of any projects that bring incremental view maintenance to SQLite?
The why:
Applications are usually read heavy. It is a sad state of affairs that, for these kinds of apps, we don't put more work on the write path to allow reads to benefit.
Would the whole No-SQL movement ever even have been a thing if relational databases had great support for materialized views that updated incrementally? I'd like to think not.
And more context:
I'm working to push the state of "functional relational programming" [1], [2] further forward. Materialized views with incremental updates are key to this. Bringing them to SQLite so they can be leveraged one the frontend would solve this whole quagmire of "state management libraries." I've been solving the data-sync problem in SQLite (https://vlcn.io/) and this piece is one of the next logical steps.
If nobody knows of an existing solution, would love to collaborate with someone on creating it.
[1] - https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/design/out-of-the-tar-pit.pdf
-
Good papers for high school students?
Here is a great Repo on GitHub named paers-we-love. You will surely find some great papers there and also some good other resources. Hope this helps.
-
I think Zig is hard but worth it
However, f and g are interchangeable anywhere else (this is not actually true because their addresses can be obtained and compared; showing that a C-like language retains its referential transparency despite the existence of so-called l-values was the point of what I think is the first paper to introduce the notion referential transparency to the study of programming languages: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/l...)
CppCoreGuidelines
- Learn Modern C++
- C++ Core Guidelines
-
Modern C++ Programming Course
You need to talk to Bjarne and Herb...
"C++ Core Guidelines" - https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines
- CLion Nova Explodes onto the C and C++ Development Scene
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
In addition to the other comments -
TypeScript deliberately takes a "good enough" approach to improving JavaScript, instead of designing an ideal but incompatible approach. For example, its handling of [function parameter bivariance](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-compatibil...) is unsound but works much better with the existing JavaScript ecosystem. By contrast, a more academic functional programming language would guarantee a sound type system but would be a huge shift from JavaScript.
By analogy, Herb Sutter is arguing that something like the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines), with tooling help in this new Cpp2 syntax, can bring real improvements to safety. Something like Rust's borrow checker would bring much stricter guarantees, backed by academic research and careful design, but would be incompatible and a huge adjustment.
-
MechE student here. Is there benefit to learning C in addition to C++, or can one do everything with C++ that can be done with C?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2olsGf6JIkU
-
C++ is everywhere, but noone really talks about it. What are people's thoughts?
Take a look at Effective Modern c++ by Scott Meyers and the ISO c++ core guidelines. These resources are great for learning how to write better, more modern C++. I don't think it would be hard to grasp if you're already familiar with the language, just make sure to actually write some code which makes use of this stuff, otherwise it's easy to forget.
-
What are some C++ specific antipatterns that might be missed by C#/Java devs?
Look to the C++ Core Guidelines. It's not perfect, it has some flaws, including some sabotaging advice apparently adopted for political reasons. But at least it has some C++ authorities (Bjarne and Herb) as authors.
- How to improve the code quality
What are some alternatives?
Crafting Interpreters - Repository for the book "Crafting Interpreters"
Flowgorithm-macOS - Flowgorithm for Mac OS
github-cheat-sheet - A list of cool features of Git and GitHub.
elm-architecture-tutorial - How to create modular Elm code that scales nicely with your app
LearnOpenGL - Code repository of all OpenGL chapters from the book and its accompanying website https://learnopengl.com
clojure-style-guide - A community coding style guide for the Clojure programming language
git-internals-pdf - PDF on Git Internals
Power-Fx - Power Fx low-code programming language
react-bits - ✨ React patterns, techniques, tips and tricks ✨