pacstall
nixpkgs
Our great sponsors
| pacstall | nixpkgs | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | 975 | |
| 1,164 | 15,656 | |
| 3.9% | 5.3% | |
| 8.7 | 10.0 | |
| 6 days ago | 4 days ago | |
| Shell | Nix | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pacstall
-
Search package in multiple managers
I use some package managers to install my programs in Kubuntu, apt which is the distro's default, pacstall and [brew](https:// brew.sh).
- Procurar pacote em múltiplos gerenciadores
-
Newish Linux user : package management woes
You might take a look at pacstall: https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall
- Pacstall – An AUR for Ubuntu
-
Rolling release between Arch and Rhino(Ubuntu based)
Looks like it's not a rolling release. It's a stable ubuntu with unstable packages (from the pacstall repo)
-
Anything similar to AUR in PopOS ? I am a Linux noob.
Check out https://pacstall.dev/
-
Yep.. I'm dumping APT for Nala.
If you use Pacstall, you can run pacstall -I nala-deb
-
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists.
- Release 3.1.0 Pearl · pacstall/pacstall
nixpkgs
- Maintainers Leaving
-
Air Force picks Anduril, General Atomics to develop unmanned fighter jets
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commits?author=neon-sunset
-
Eelco Dolstra's leadership is corrosive to the Nix project
I see two signers in the top 6 displayed on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/graphs/contributors
-
3rd Edition of Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++ by Stroustrup
For a single file script, nix can make the package management quite easy: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-f...
For example,
```
- NixOS/nixpkgs: There isn't a clear canonical way to refer to a specific package
-
NixOS Is Not Reproducible
Yes, Nix doesn't actually ensure that the builds are deterministic. In fact it works just fine if they aren't. There are packages in nixpkgs that aren't reproducible: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aiss...
-
The xz attack shell script
I'm not familiar with Bazel, but Nix in it's current form wouldn't have solved this attack. First of all, the standard mkDerivation function calls the same configure; make; make install process that made this attack possible. Nixpkgs regularly pulls in external resources (fetchUrl and friends) that are equally vulnerable to a poisoned release tarball. Checkout the comment on the current xz entry in nixpkgs https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/comp...
-
Debian Git Monorepo
NixOS uses a monorepo and I think everyone's love it.
I love being able to easily grep through all the packages source code and there's regularly PRs that harmonizes conventions across many packages.
Nixpkgs doesn't include the packaged software source code, so it's a lot more practical than what Debian is doing.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
-
From xz to ibus: more questionable tarballs
In this specific case, nix uses fetchFromGitHub to download the source archive, which are generated by GitHub for the specified revision[1]. Arch seems to just download the tarball from the releases page[2].
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/3c2fdd0a4e6396fc310a6e...
[2]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/ib...
-
GitHub Disabled the Xz Repo
True, but irrelevant -- _some packages_, _somewhere_, do depend on xz, which, if built, requires pulling the source from GitHub (see the default.nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-23.11/pkgs/tools...)
It's not the vulnerability that's a problem right now (NixOS was protected by a couple of factors) but rather GitHub's hamfisted response.
That is the problem.
What are some alternatives?
makedeb - A simplicity-focused packaging tool for Debian archives
asdf - Extendable version manager with support for Ruby, Node.js, Elixir, Erlang & more
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
Home Manager using Nix - Manage a user environment using Nix [maintainer=@rycee]
archtorify - Transparent proxy through Tor for Arch Linux OS
git-lfs - Git extension for versioning large files
mpm - makedeb package manager
easyeffects - Limiter, compressor, convolver, equalizer and auto volume and many other plugins for PipeWire applications
deb-get - apt-get for .debs published via GitHub or direct download 📦
spack - A flexible package manager that supports multiple versions, configurations, platforms, and compilers.
distrobox - Use any linux distribution inside your terminal. Enable both backward and forward compatibility with software and freedom to use whatever distribution you’re more comfortable with. Mirror available at: https://gitlab.com/89luca89/distrobox
waydroid - Waydroid uses a container-based approach to boot a full Android system on a regular GNU/Linux system like Ubuntu.