pacstall-programs VS nala

No, no, not the pacstall itself. I was talking about this issue. It's solved now, so it's not a big issue. But should keep an eye on potential issues like that and report them.

The Pacstall dev team reviewes each PR before it's merged into our official repository.

There are primarily four types of packages in the pacstall-programs repo.

All pacscripts are stored in a GitHub repo. Pacscripts need to go through two layer security check. We use pacscript to install the package using workflows and in VMs to ensure that all pacscripts are safe and don't cause any harm to your system. You can submit pacscripts by creating a pull request. You can be sure that your system will not have any issues when installing package using pacstall.

I assumed the AUR, but they come from https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall-programs

Use nala instead: https://gitlab.com/volian/nala

Try switching to Nala for your apt front end. Way better experience.

I do like Nala front-end for "apt". I'm new to it, but it would likely be at the top of my script.

You can use nala and do a sudo nala fetch command to find the fastest repo servers.

You’d need to be on testing or sid for nala. It’s also available from the website and you can install with dpkg.

Nala is available on Stable, but you have to use our repositories as specified in our installation instructions https://gitlab.com/volian/nala/-/wikis/Installation.

nala says hello.

I know that Nala has support for this, but it's one of the lesser used features so there could be some bugs present. https://gitlab.com/volian/nala

idk anything like this, but you can use Nala, to make apt looks better. :)