pacstall-programs VS pacstall

No, no, not the pacstall itself. I was talking about this issue. It's solved now, so it's not a big issue. But should keep an eye on potential issues like that and report them.

The Pacstall dev team reviewes each PR before it's merged into our official repository.

There are primarily four types of packages in the pacstall-programs repo.

All pacscripts are stored in a GitHub repo. Pacscripts need to go through two layer security check. We use pacscript to install the package using workflows and in VMs to ensure that all pacscripts are safe and don't cause any harm to your system. You can submit pacscripts by creating a pull request. You can be sure that your system will not have any issues when installing package using pacstall.

I assumed the AUR, but they come from https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall-programs

I use some package managers to install my programs in Kubuntu, apt which is the distro's default, pacstall and [brew](https:// brew.sh).

You might take a look at pacstall: https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall

Looks like it's not a rolling release. It's a stable ubuntu with unstable packages (from the pacstall repo)

Check out https://pacstall.dev/

If you use Pacstall, you can run pacstall -I nala-deb

Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists.