venom
vitest
venom | vitest | |
---|---|---|
6 | 110 | |
976 | 11,831 | |
1.8% | 1.7% | |
7.3 | 9.8 | |
9 days ago | 7 days ago | |
Go | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
venom
-
Ask HN: What's your favorite software testing framework and why?
You can also load fixtures in database directly, work with Kafka queues both as a producer (e.g. write an event to a Kafka queue, wait a few seconds and see that it was consumed by the service you test, and that some side effects can be observed) or as a consumer (e.g. make sure after an HTTP call, an event was correctly pushed to a queue), or even read a mailbox in IMAP to check that your service correctly send an email.
It's a bit rough on the edges sometimes, but I'd never go back on writing integration tests directly in my programming language. Declarative is the way to go.
[1]: https://github.com/ovh/venom
-
Easy Integration Testing with Venom!
To write and run our integration tests, we'll use Venom. Venom is a tool created and made open-source by OVHcloud: https://github.com/ovh/venom
- Venom: Manage and run your integration tests with efficiency
-
Show HN: Step CI â API Testing and Monitoring Made Simple
From my experience, generated tests are worthless for anything more serious than smoke tests. I prefer working with no tests than automated tests, I feel they give you a false sense of confidence.
The Step CI engine itself looks good though. It looks like a cleaner, but less powerful version of a tool (open source, build in-house) we used when I worked at OVHcloud, Venom: https://github.com/ovh/venom
Here's an example test file for the HTTP executor of Venom: https://github.com/ovh/venom/blob/master/tests/http.yml it's very close to Step CI format.
I'd still use Venom because it's way more powerful (you have DB executors for example, so after executing a POST request you can actually check in DB that you have what you expect) and I prefer focusing on actually writing integration tests instead of generating them.
Maybe this post sounds harsh (I feel it as I write it because I have strong feelings against test generation) but I think your approach is a good one for actually writing automated tests. Testing APIs declaratively like this has a great benefit: your tests work on an interface. You can migrate your API to a whole new stack and your tests remain the same. I did it multiple time at OVHcloud: one time migrating a huge API from a Go router to another (Gin->Echo), and another time migrating public APIs from a legacy, in-house Perl engine to a Go server.
-
Debugging with GDB
I still struggle with GDB but my excuse is that I seldom use it.
When I was studying reverse engineering though, I came across a really cool kit (which I've yet to find an alternative for lldb, which would be nice given: rust)
I'd recommend checking it out, if for no other reason than it makes a lot of things really obvious (like watching what value lives in which register).
https://github.com/hugsy/gef
LLDB's closest alternative to this is called Venom, but it's not the same at all. https://github.com/ovh/venom
-
Do you write integration tests in go?
We incorporated [Venom](https://github.com/ovh/venom) into our workflow. It's great for initiating and managing a suite of yaml based tests. It didn't work out of the box for us due to the heavily asynchronous nature of our system, but after a few additions, it has helped my team greatly. We were often afraid to make large changes to critical pieces of the system since a full regression test could take a week or so to check everything. Now it takes an hour.
vitest
-
Integration Testing in Obsidian
Using something like Vitest, Jest, or Mocha didn't work because:
-
Easier TypeScript API Testing with Vitest + MSW
However, I discovered a great combination that transformed my API call testing in TypeScript: Vitest and Mock Service Worker (MSW). Their well-crafted design makes them incredibly easy to use, enhancing the overall testing experience.
-
Vitest In-Source Testing for SFC in Vue?
Next weâll install Vitest and happy-dom to the project by running:
-
Creating a reusable Design System between React and React Native with Tamagui
vitest is a testing framework similar to jest that integrates well with projects using Vite. It allows us to reuse plugins and configurations already set up in the vite.config.ts, making the test setup process easier.
- Criando um Design System reutilizĂĄvel entre React e React Native com Tamagui
-
Test your React Apps with Vitest
For more detailed information on Vitest, refer to the official documentation. fficient Testing in Your React Projects with Vitest.
-
Um jĂșnior e um teste tĂ©cnico: The battle.
Vitest
-
Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
Are you looking to migrate from Jest to Vitest for your React application? Look no further.
-
Faster testing with Angular and Vitest âĄïž
In addition to those tools, a new testing framework has emerged named Vitest. Vitest is built on top of Vite and has many exciting features to keep improving the overall developer experience for writing tests. This post shows you how to set up Vitest in your existing Angular project.
- Whatâs your Vue application testing strategy?
What are some alternatives?
godog - Cucumber for golang
jest - Delightful JavaScript Testing.
dockertest - Write better integration tests! Dockertest helps you boot up ephermal docker images for your Go tests with minimal work.
Playwright - Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.
testcontainers-go - Testcontainers for Go is a Go package that makes it simple to create and clean up container-based dependencies for automated integration/smoke tests. The clean, easy-to-use API enables developers to programmatically define containers that should be run as part of a test and clean up those resources when the test is done.
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
stepci - Automated API Testing and Quality Assurance
ava - Node.js test runner that lets you develop with confidence đ
gotestfmt - go test output for humans
happy-dom - A JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface
gotestfmt - go test output for humans
Next.js - The React Framework