orger
w2g
Our great sponsors
orger | w2g | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
294 | 43 | |
- | - | |
5.3 | 10.0 | |
4 months ago | over 3 years ago | |
Python | Python | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
orger
-
Gains I'm Seeing from My Second Brain Tool
This is my approach!
I'm using HPI [0] as a sort of universal API for almost all of my data (manual notes, bookmarks, instant messages, internet comments, etc)
Then I use it in tools like Orger [1] and Promnesia [2] which function as my second brain
[0] https://github.com/karlicoss/HPI
[1] https://github.com/karlicoss/orger
[2] https://beepb00p.xyz/promnesia.html
w2g
-
The Fall of Roam
A friend of Conor White-Sullivan (Roam's creator) propped up his own take on how to do a notetaking system that does support edges, and then he went a step further and opened it for everyone to edit, so it's just a single shared graph:
<https://github.com/w2g/w2g>
Mek works at the Internet Archive, and it clearly follows the same spirit of "we'll operate the service, feel free to bring your own frontend if you don't like ours". I wasn't happy with the way that one at graph.global tries to subvert/duplicate native browser features, so I put up a minimal "client" for browsing existing nodes that feels similar to the default one, sans annoyances on those specific axes:
<https://graph.5apps.com/LP/streamline>
I never got around to allowing editing, unfortunately. You'll have to use the default frontend for that (annoying, since it's buggy) or write a client of your own.
The key issue I see with the graph.global model is that you have to use triples. I've found that this results in big hurdles for throughput—i.e., the opposite of notational velocity. The ideal thing would probably be to allow a Roam-like system where you can start out by simply linking two related nodes, and then fill the edge details after the fact. You could sort of approximate this with w2g as it stands by just using a generic is-related-to connector and then reify the relation. This does mean you would lose the ability to query by relation unless you add further attributes or went back and edited the original connector to replace it with something more appropriate before reification. Stopping in your tracks to find the appropriate connector is something I found to have lots of overhead.
-
Gains I'm Seeing from My Second Brain Tool
This is, in theory, what graph.global is supposed to be (by Mek from OpenLibrary / Internet Archive).
<https://github.com/w2g/w2g>
What are some alternatives?
docs - Logseq documentation
promnesia - Another piece of your extended mind
notes-in-org-format-
sursis - A [personal]<-[notebook]->[network]. Complete with custom numerics for constrained Gaussian gravitation physics.
org-roam-pygraph - Python library to build graphs out of org-roam collections
logseq - A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life.
Memacs - What did I do on February 14th 2007? Visualize your (digital) life in Org-mode
nolific - A very simple web based note solution that's designed to serve as my second brain.
oporg - In-repo task management using org-ehtml and modified bigblow from org-html-themes.
simplenote-ios - Simplenote for iOS