org.chromium.Chromium | com.visualstudio.code | |
---|---|---|
33 | 36 | |
35 | 124 | |
- | 0.0% | |
8.2 | 7.5 | |
6 days ago | 19 days ago | |
Shell | Shell | |
- | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
org.chromium.Chromium
Posts with mentions or reviews of org.chromium.Chromium.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-20.
-
Chrome Browser - Blurry Text After Gnome 44.1 Update (under Wayland)
Seems like it's a buggy wayland fractional scalling implementation... It's reverted in the chromium flatpak https://github.com/flathub/org.chromium.Chromium/commit/eea7af903decb3a3b9bb6fdacbb55d24a90e18f3
-
Canonical releases Ubuntu 23.04 Lunar Lobster
My philosophy has been to let the distro package manager handle system packages (kernel, OpenSSL, etc) but then use flatpak [1] to install user progs like Chromium and VSCode so I get bleeding edge releases and sandboxing.
[1] https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.chromium.Chromium
-
Some questions from a noob about using Linux
If it helps I'm using https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.chromium.Chromium along with https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.github.tchx84.Flatseal
- How do I install chromium as deb in ubuntu 22.10?
- I'm getting strange font errors in certain Flatpak apps.
- Give specific permission to flatpak Firefox
-
Is starting snaps directly from their installation folder fine when you don't care about sandboxing? (e.g starting chromium snap directly from /snap/chromium/current/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome)
You can inspect how Chromium is built on Flatpak here: https://github.com/flathub/org.chromium.Chromium
-
Issues with VS CODE on POP OS ( i need help please)
Oh that doesn't work? Hmm I wonder if you could try the executable listed at https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.chromium.Chromium and put that in your config?
-
Will Google Chrome be fully isolated if I install it through Toolbox?
No need to trust anything, unlike snaps, the way they're distributed is public and open source: https://github.com/flathub/org.chromium.Chromium
-
Looks like a Up2Date Kernel is in the works!
Would a workaround be installing chromium from flathub, and using that for browsing? https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.chromium.Chromium
com.visualstudio.code
Posts with mentions or reviews of com.visualstudio.code.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-07.
-
Fedora Workstation 41 to No Longer Install Gnome X.org Session by Default
vscodium flatpak fonts are already fine; IME vscodium works with font scaling fine out of the box. There's a vscode flatpak issue: "Feature: add optional Wayland support" https://github.com/flathub/com.visualstudio.code/issues/471#...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39625917#39637408
- Dualbooting windows vs. virtual machine
- Flatpak launching external program
-
How to make flatpak IDEs detect system interpreters
The VSCode flatpak README has some solutions:
-
Cannot open visual code on command line using "code" and "vscode"
Otherwise, you could install the flatpak version from Flathub and that alias would start doing what it's intended to do: https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.visualstudio.code
-
what is the best way to install apps in fedora?
For VSCode, it looks like you need to do a little bit of work to get it working properly in Flatpak. Everything should work if you put in the elbow grease, but this is one of those examples where Flatpak makes things a bit funky for people unfamiliar with how it works, and it doesn't help that Microsoft doesn't officially support the Flatpak.
- I can't install VS Code
-
VS Code Settings for Flatpack
Please open issues under: https://github.com/flathub/com.visualstudio.code/issues This version is running inside a container and is therefore not able to access SDKs on your host system! To execute commands on the host system, run inside the sandbox:
- Flatpak version of vscode is showing this error..... I cannot login to github account and sync settings
-
Debug Golang com VSCode
VSCode versão 1.74.1 instalado via flatpak;
What are some alternatives?
When comparing org.chromium.Chromium and com.visualstudio.code you can also consider the following projects:
xdg-desktop-portal-wlr - xdg-desktop-portal backend for wlroots
net.lutris.Lutris
com.discordapp.Discord
com.valvesoftware.Steam
chromium-freeworld - chromium-freeworld - free
com.sublimetext.three
zypak - Run Electron binaries in a sandboxed Flatpak environment
flatpak-vscode - Integrate Flatpak with VSCode
svntogit-packages - Automatic import of svn 'packages' repo (read-only mirror)
flathub - Issue tracker and new submissions
Firefox-Appimage - Mozilla Firefox Stable AppImages by Continuous Integration
org.telegram.desktop
org.chromium.Chromium vs xdg-desktop-portal-wlr
com.visualstudio.code vs net.lutris.Lutris
org.chromium.Chromium vs com.discordapp.Discord
com.visualstudio.code vs com.valvesoftware.Steam
org.chromium.Chromium vs chromium-freeworld
com.visualstudio.code vs com.sublimetext.three
org.chromium.Chromium vs zypak
com.visualstudio.code vs flatpak-vscode
org.chromium.Chromium vs svntogit-packages
com.visualstudio.code vs flathub
org.chromium.Chromium vs Firefox-Appimage
com.visualstudio.code vs org.telegram.desktop