openssl-cmake
Build OpenSSL with CMake on MacOS, Win32, Win64 and cross compile for Android, IOS (by janbar)
wolfssl
The wolfSSL library is a small, fast, portable implementation of TLS/SSL for embedded devices to the cloud. wolfSSL supports up to TLS 1.3! (by wolfSSL)
| openssl-cmake | wolfssl | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 262 | 2,180 | |
| - | 1.2% | |
| 5.7 | 9.9 | |
| 5 months ago | 6 days ago | |
| C | C | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
openssl-cmake
Posts with mentions or reviews of openssl-cmake.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-22.
-
I think C++ is still a desirable coding platform compared to Rust
There is this one: https://github.com/janbar/openssl-cmake but I mostly use it to embed OpenSSL.
wolfssl
Posts with mentions or reviews of wolfssl.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-27.
-
“Purchasing an arm”
Or something a bit more lightweight - https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl
- WolfSSL
- Security Advisory 2022-10-04-1 - wolfSSL buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake (CVE-2022-39173)
- Getting started with wolfssl
-
Ask HN: Can a TCP connection be MitM attacked if already established?
> I have no room for TLS on micro computer
How micro is your micro? There are embedded TLS stacks such as wolfSSL[1]. If you carefully select the cipher suite and certificate requirements, and perhaps limit TLS payload sizes, you may be able to fit on a lot more systems than you initially suspect. x.509 is expensive in code space though, if that's the constraint, you may do better with an application specific certificate replacement of some sort.
[1] https://www.wolfssl.com/
- The project with a single 11,000-line code file
- Information and learning resources for cryptography newcomers
-
CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or more cryptographic protocol libraries, like GnuTLS, OpenSSL, or wolfSSL. But why is this such a problem?
-
FOSS News International #2: November 8-145, 2021
wolfSSL 5.0.0
- WolfSSL Release 5.0.0