opensource VS OpenDevin

Pieces has several advantages as we head into an AI agent future. Thanks to its on-device, air-gapped nature, security concerns are almost non-existent. Their commitment to open source ensures that developers get a chance to adapt systems at scale. The speed of local inference running on Pieces OS feels faster than many data center-driven APIs.

They also have their own Open Source Projects where beginners can contribute. Also They organize Monthly Open Source meetups and regular Twitter Spaces on different topics.

If you would like to get more involved with this project, you can check out our OpenSource Repo or this project on Github to download the complete code.

Now you have all of the tools you need to ask questions of your own personal copilot, see how you can quickly communicate back and forth with the copilot itself and some light configuration if you need it for your UI. There are more resources available, an entire Open Source Community, and a number of repos/SDKS with other examples and projects underway.

We discussed the importance of community contributions and the plans to centralize all links and repositories for a smoother collaborative experience. We emphasized the importance of active contributions in making the entire experience better and faster, and encouraged community members to contribute to the ideas on the discussions tab of our OpenSource GitHub Repository to collaborate on planning out these ideas.

Open Devin is an innovative open-source project that builds on the ideas and capabilities of Devin. Employing technologies like Docker and Kubernetes for secure code execution and featuring a user-friendly interface designed with React, Open Devin supports real-time developer interactions and adjustments. Its versatility is supported by a community-driven approach, encouraging developer contributions and rapid adaptation to new technologies.

We have an issue in OpenDevin to add Aider as an agent, if anyone wants to take a crack at it:

https://github.com/OpenDevin/OpenDevin/issues/120

So… don’t hold your breath. If you see someone building a UI (like this https://github.com/OpenDevin/OpenDevin/tree/main/frontend, https://github.com/stitionai/devika/tree/main/ui; just read the commit log, it’s basically just ui

Yes. If you link to the UI sections of a repo you will likely see "basically just ui" commit history.

I guess you could argue that it’s important “setup infrastructure” stuff that any project starts with… but I’m just sceptical.

Of course it's an early stage pilot, it's only been developed since the Devin hype, why should it compete in quality at this very early time?

Is this similar to Devin (https://github.com/OpenDevin/OpenDevin)?

> @justlin610: Me and @huybery are discussing about reproducing Devin. https://github.com/opendevin/opendevin Come and join us and see if we can make something great together!

Developers can thrive thanks to open source! I believe that AI's future lies in sharing and open-source principles. With tools such as Devin, developers have nothing to fear about job security. Rather, they gain a free personal programming assistant. This allows them to concentrate on generating innovative ideas, while the AI handles the technical tasks, ultimately freeing up their time.