open-llms VS WizardLM

Everyone knows about ChatGPT by now, but did you know there are other models like "Mistral" or "Falcon" - you can view a full list of open-source models here or on huggingface.

This is the most well-maintained list of commercially usable open LLMs: https://github.com/eugeneyan/open-llms

MPT, OpenLLaMA, and Falcon are probably the most generally useful.

For code, Replit Code (specifically replit-code-instruct-glaive) and StarCoder (WizardCoder-15B) are the current top open models and both can be used commercially.

There's also MPT, which has a 7B, and Falcon, with a 7B and 40B although they have not had the inference tuning in community projects that the llamas have had. This is a good repo for reviewing what's available atm: https://github.com/eugeneyan/open-llms

If I was going to do the same I would at least build off of something, check out https://github.com/eugeneyan/open-llms, you should at least have a decent understanding of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and this link is pretty good on the basic concepts you need inc classification and learning types, good luck friend.

This list might help: https://github.com/eugeneyan/open-llms

This is interesting work, and a good contribution, but there is no need to mislead people.

[1] https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM

If you pair this with the latest WizardCoder models, which have a fairly better performance than the standard Salesforce Codegen2 and Codegen2.5, you have a pretty solid alternative to GitHub Copilot that runs completely locally.

(We will update the demo links in our github.)

In terms of speed, we're talking about 140t/s for 7B models, and 40t/s for 33B models on a 3090/4090 now.[1] (1 token ~= 0.75 word) It's quite zippy. llama.cpp performs close on Nvidia GPUs now (but they don't have a handy chart) and you can get decent performance on 13B models on M1/M2 Macs.

You can take a look at a list of evals here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/evals/page/list-of-evals - for general usage, I think home-rolled evals like llm-jeopardy [2] and local-llm-comparison [3] by hobbyists are more useful than most of the benchmark rankings.

That being said, personally I mostly use GPT-4 for code assistance to that's what I'm most interested in, and the latest code assistants are scoring quite well: https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval - a recent replit-3b fine tune the human-eval results for open models (as a point of reference, GPT-3.5 gets 60.4 on pass@1 and 68.9 on pass@10 [4]) - I've only just started playing around with it since replit model tooling is not as good as llamas (doc here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/howto-guides/page/replit-mode...).

I'm interested in potentially applying reflexion or some of the other techniques that have been tried to even further increase coding abilities. (InterCode in particular has caught my eye https://intercode-benchmark.github.io/)

[1] https://github.com/turboderp/exllama#results-so-far

[2] https://github.com/aigoopy/llm-jeopardy

[3] https://github.com/Troyanovsky/Local-LLM-comparison/tree/mai...

[4] https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder

You talking about this? https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM

The smallest model that is close to competent at code is WizardCoder 15B.. https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/

WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct (https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder)