ofc-bootstrap VS pipecd

Compare ofc-bootstrap vs pipecd and see what are their differences.

ofc-bootstrap

Bootstrap OpenFaaS Cloud for your team (by openfaas)
Automation Openfaas openfaas-cloud Gitops Serverless SaaS managed Platform multi-tenant multi-user ci-cd

DISCONTINUED

Suggest alternative
Edit details

pipecd

The One CD for All {applications, platforms, operations} (by pipe-cd)
Kubernetes Terraform Serverless Gitops Infrastructure Istio Ecs Lambda cloudrun continuous-delivery Fargate Cd Cncf DevOps ci-cd Cicd pipecd cncf-project Sandbox
Source Code
pipecd.dev
Docs
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
ofc-bootstrap pipecd
1 1
177 977
- 2.3%
7.0 9.4
over 3 years ago 4 days ago
Go Go
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ofc-bootstrap

Posts with mentions or reviews of ofc-bootstrap. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-04.

pipecd

Posts with mentions or reviews of pipecd. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-12.
  • Automation assistants: GitOps tools in comparison
    28 projects | dev.to | 12 Aug 2021
    A newer competitor is Fleet, which is developed by Rancher. Its special ability is that it is able to manage not just one, but a fleet of clusters. PipeCD is similarly young and has an even broader focus. Like Fleet, it promises the ability to manage multiple Kubernetes clusters, and it also offers a UI. In addition, it can handle Terraform and some services from the major cloud providers.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ofc-bootstrap and pipecd you can also consider the following projects:

faasd - A lightweight & portable faas engine

argo-cd - Declarative Continuous Deployment for Kubernetes

gke-managed-certs - Managed Certificates for Kubernetes clusters using GCLB

atlantis - Terraform Pull Request Automation

makeless-go - [BETA] Makeless - SaaS Framework - Golang Implementation

fleet - Deploy workloads from Git to large fleets of Kubernetes clusters

waypoint-plugin-openfaas - Deploy a function to OpenFaaS with HashiCorp Waypoint

terraform-controller - Use K8s to Run Terraform

Flux - Successor: https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2

awesome-gitops - A curated list for awesome GitOps resources

externalsecret-operator - An operator to fetch secrets from cloud services and inject them in Kubernetes

terraform-k8s - Terraform Cloud Operator for Kubernetes

ofc-bootstrap vs faasd pipecd vs argo-cd ofc-bootstrap vs gke-managed-certs pipecd vs atlantis ofc-bootstrap vs makeless-go pipecd vs fleet ofc-bootstrap vs waypoint-plugin-openfaas pipecd vs terraform-controller pipecd vs Flux pipecd vs awesome-gitops pipecd vs externalsecret-operator pipecd vs terraform-k8s