odigos VS tempo

Welcome 👋 to this blog. Did you want to use odigos on your Ubuntu machine but don't know how to start? Then this blog will definitely help you and it also helps you to understand the basic aspect of the odigos project.

Disclaimer: I am one of the maintainers

Many comments complain about the complexity of using OpenTelemetry, I recommend checking out Odigos, an open-source project which makes working with OpenTelemetry much easier: https://github.com/keyval-dev/odigos

We combine OpenTelemetry and eBPF to instantly generate distributed traces without any code changes.

Check it out here: https://github.com/keyval-dev/odigos

Hi, sure here is the link to Odigos: https://github.com/keyval-dev/odigos We do not replace Grafana or any other monitoring vendor. We build them a better pipeline with higher quality signals (distributed tracing). They still do the visualization, it will just display better information.

Check out mor about Odigos, our open source project at https://github.com/keyval-dev/odigos

Grafana Tempo also switched from Protobuf storage format to Apache Parquet last year. It's fully open source, and the proposal is here: https://github.com/grafana/tempo/blob/main/docs/design-propo...

disclosure: I work for Grafana!

By combining Grafana Tempo with Tracetest, you can create a robust solution for monitoring and testing APIs with distributed tracing.

Last point: There's already a major open source project in the backend space called Tempo. You may want to reconsider the name.

I started the day with some Rust and spent the rest of the day in the Monitoring and Observability DevRoom. Most of the talks I attended were about OpenTelemetry and were very Grafana Labs-heavy. I knew Grafana and, to a less extent, Loki, and I had never seen Tempo (distributed tracing) and Phlare (profiling), and Mimir (backend for metrics, more backend-y than Prometheus?).

Grafana Tempo yes. Integrates seamlessly with Grafana (the dashboarding)