NumPy VS Flask

In NumPy with @, dot() or matmul():

In NumPy with * or multiply(). ` or multiply()` can multiply 0D or more D arrays by element-wise multiplication.

Data science projects often use numpy. However, numpy objects are not JSON-serializable and therefore require conversion to standard python objects in order to be saved:

numpy: A library for scientific computing in Python

Python has become a preferred language for data analysis due to its simplicity and robust library ecosystem. Among these, NumPy stands out with its efficient handling of numerical data. Let’s say you’re working with numbers for large data sets—something Python’s native data structures may find challenging. That’s where NumPy arrays come into play, making numerical computations seamless and speedy.

I was looking at all the big projects like numpy, pytorch, flask, etc.

I wish the NumPy devs would more thoroughly consider adding full fluent API support, e.g. x.sqrt().ceil(). [Issue #24081]

I'd suggest Flask or some of the smaller projects in the Pallets ecosystem:

https://github.com/pallets/flask

#!/usr/bin/python # # https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0.x/installation/ # from flask import Flask, jsonify, request contacts = [ { "id": "1", "firstname": "Lorem", "lastname": "Ipsum", "email": "[email protected]", }, { "id": "2", "firstname": "Mauris", "lastname": "Quis", "email": "[email protected]", }, { "id": "3", "firstname": "Donec Purus", "lastname": "Purus", "email": "[email protected]", } ] app = Flask(__name__, static_url_path='', static_folder='public',) @app.route("/contact//save", methods=["PUT"]) def save_contact(id): data = request.json contacts[id - 1] = data return jsonify(contacts[id - 1]) @app.route("/contact/", methods=["GET"]) @app.route("/contact//edit", methods=["GET"]) def get_contact(id): return jsonify(contacts[id - 1]) @app.route('/') def root(): return app.send_static_file('index.html') if __name__ == '__main__': app.run(debug=True)

I was looking at all the big projects like numpy, pytorch, flask, etc.

Explore here.

I may use Flask-Admin initially to offload the "CRUD" operations to have an initial prototype fast but then drop it ASAP because I don't want to write a "flask-admin application" to fight against later on. If the application is mainly "CRUD", then Flask-Admin is suitable.

Now...

Would you do a breakdown/list of all the jobs you've done by sector/vertical and by function/role and by application functionality?

- [0]: https://flask.palletsprojects.com

- [1]: https://flask-admin.readthedocs.io/en/latest

- [2]: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.3.x/patterns/celery

- [3]: https://sentry.io

- [4]: https://posthog.com

- [5]: https://www.docker.com

In the lab to follow, we will be setting up an end-to-end DevOps workflow for a Flask microservice with GitHub Actions, using a self-managed custom runner for maximal control over the pipeline execution environment and automating deployments to a local Kubernetes cluster. Furthermore, we will construct separate pipelines for our "development" and "production" environments to further elaborate on the concepts of continuous deployment and delivery.

Flask Micro web Framework: You will use Flask to build a Flask web application.

In an earlier post I mentioned a bunch of Open Source web applications. Let's now focus on the ones written in Python using Flask the light-weight web framework.