nsjail
firejail
nsjail | firejail | |
---|---|---|
6 | 139 | |
2,785 | 5,449 | |
1.2% | - | |
7.9 | 9.7 | |
3 months ago | 1 day ago | |
C++ | C | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nsjail
-
Server-side sandboxing: Containers and seccomp
So what's the difference between nsjail[1] and bubblewrap[2]?
[1] https://github.com/google/nsjail
- Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Sandboxing C++, Rust, Python Code?
I am currently working on a code execution engine (also written in Rust) which uses nsjail for sandboxing and gnu time for measuring time and memory usage under the hood. You can run arbitrary code simply using a rest api and there is also a client library for Rust. It can already run C++, Rust and Python (and a few other languages) while allowing you to specify multiple source files, environment variables, command line arguments, standard input and resource limits (e.g. time, memory, maximum number of processes and whether network access is allowed or not). After running the program, the engine reports exit codes, outputs (stdout and stderr) and the amount of resources the program used.
- WebAssembly: Adding Python Support to WASM Language Runtimes
- Notes on Running Containers with Bubblewrap
- Bubblewrap: Unprivileged Sandboxing Tool for Linux
firejail
-
Sandboxing All the Things with Flatpak and BubbleBox
bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.
Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.
If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
-
Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.
I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:
```
-
Toolship: A (More) Secure Workstation
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/
Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.
This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...
TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.
Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.
-
Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).
Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":
- Firejail: Light featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Do, or do not. There is no try
Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc
-
Strange times make for strange friends...
What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?
What are some alternatives?
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
crosvm - The Chrome OS Virtual Machine Monitor - Mirror of https://chromium.googlesource.com/crosvm/crosvm/
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
RIP - Free,Open-Source,Cross-platform agent and Post-exploiton tool written in Golang and C++.
bubblejail - Bubblewrap based sandboxing for desktop applications
wasmtime-py - Python WebAssembly runtime powered by Wasmtime
Flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions
logkeys - :memo: :keyboard: A GNU/Linux keylogger that works!
yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning
sandkasten - Run untrusted code in an isolated environment
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.