noise-repellent VS noise-suppression-for-voice

Frankly, what I hear is very similar to the results of classic spectral denoising, even with the characteristic artifacts (for Linux, there's Noise Repellent [1] available for advanced spectral denoising; there's also a ton of commercial spectral processors).

The demonstration could use more random background noises to separate it from spectral processors, and more varied vocabulary to separate it from RNNVoice [2] which tends to suppress breath and parts of sibilants, making the sound unnatural. The latency is also important - is it as low as in RNNVoice? What about the CPU load?

[1] https://github.com/lucianodato/noise-repellent

[2] https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice

There's noise cancelling plugins. Example https://github.com/lucianodato/noise-repellent/releases/tag/v0.2.3 Or https://bertomaudio.com/denoiser-classic.html

Downloaded noise-repellent 0.2.3 for Linux at https://github.com/lucianodato/noise-repellent/releases

Plugins: LSP Plugins DISTRHO Plugins Calf Plugins TAP Plugins Noise-Repellent (The best thinge ever!)

The only thing it is missing natively which Audacity had built-in is background noise filtering; but that is easily accomplished with a plugin such as Lucian Dato's Noise Repellent.

Bertom denoiser is decent, noise repellent which can be found Here is another good one that is Foss which is a bonus aswell.

Yes, I think it pipes the default input (source) to the default output. I have a noise cancelling source and if I switch to it the loopback follows it and I hear the de-noised one

For linux: https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice

Frankly, what I hear is very similar to the results of classic spectral denoising, even with the characteristic artifacts (for Linux, there's Noise Repellent [1] available for advanced spectral denoising; there's also a ton of commercial spectral processors).

The demonstration could use more random background noises to separate it from spectral processors, and more varied vocabulary to separate it from RNNVoice [2] which tends to suppress breath and parts of sibilants, making the sound unnatural. The latency is also important - is it as low as in RNNVoice? What about the CPU load?

[1] https://github.com/lucianodato/noise-repellent

[2] https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice

Nice, hopefully you or somebody else will turn this into an easy to use PipeWire plugin, so I can replace noise-suppression-for-voice.

I use this plugin to remove the sound of my air conditioner, which can be quite loud: https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice

This comes very close to RTX Voice while being multiple times more efficient. Not as good as RTX Voice but I prefer much lower HW usage.

bonus points if you use equalizerAPO + a VST plugin for noise suppression if you really need to suppress noise.

I like the RNNoise plugin so much I ended up using it in my audio tracks too when doing vocals.

equalizerAPO + https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice