rip VS rmt.rs

I still use Rip (Rm Improved) even though it hasn't updated in 4 years https://github.com/nivekuil/rip . But a tool this simple doesn't need to

This looks like a nice replacement for the seemingly defunct rip: https://github.com/nivekuil/rip. Will definitely have to play around with this.

rip is an improved version of the rm command. It is faster, safer, and user-friendly. rip sends deleted files to a temp location so they can be recovered using rip -u. I really like the simplicity and the revert feature, as I don't have to worry about accidentally deleting something using rm. While rip can be aliased to replace rm, the creators advise not doing that as you might get used to it and do rm on other systems where you cannot revert the delete.

There is `rip`[1] (also written in Rust) which does more or less the same? Or am I missing something?

[1] https://github.com/nivekuil/rip

Looks nice, how does it compare to rip?

https://github.com/nivekuil/rip making people use things like that is scary, people really don't like change and i really don't like to preach anything for anyone. But i use it... i remember getting into arguments about CLI mp3 players and why they are stupid for my use case and i almost lost my mind, i don't want to be the person talking about RM lol.

I use rip for most things

When a person delete an item, I get all the information that are interesting for me (https://github.com/AmineZouitine/rmt.rs/blob/main/src/trash_...), and then I move it in a .trash folder in which I rename it with a hash (the hash is made with several parameters to avoid any collision), I then store the information in a database sqlite :)