netzob VS boofuzz

Compare netzob vs boofuzz and see what are their differences.

netzob

Netzob: Protocol Reverse Engineering, Modeling and Fuzzing (by netzob)
Reverse Engineering Network Protocols Python traffic-generation Fuzzing Automata zoby
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

boofuzz

A fork and successor of the Sulley Fuzzing Framework (by jtpereyda)
Fuzzing Python Security
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
netzob boofuzz
2 1
747 1,957
0.8% -
0.0 7.3
8 days ago 3 days ago
Python Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

netzob

Posts with mentions or reviews of netzob. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-06.

boofuzz

Posts with mentions or reviews of boofuzz. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-07.
  • Microsoft Teams, Exchange Server, Windows 10 Hacked in Pwn2Own 2021
    2 projects | /r/sysadmin | 7 Apr 2021
    The one thing that's not really fully encapsulated in a lot of these comment chains below is the role of custom written fuzzers for competitions like this. Frameworks like AFL, BooFuzz, etc. A properly written test file will allow for most of the hunting to happen automagically by tampering with function calls or inputs until something crashes. By configuring an environment appropriately, you can run millions of test cases, and get the crashes logged to parse through later. This allows the researchers/exploit writers to only focus on the exceptions/traces that seem the most fruitful. This is one methodology, it's not the case for everyone, but most codebases are too big to go through the ASM by hand these days.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing netzob and boofuzz you can also consider the following projects:

scapy - Scapy: the Python-based interactive packet manipulation program & library. Supports Python 2 & Python 3.

American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer

pyinstxtractor - PyInstaller Extractor

libfuzzer - Thin interface for libFuzzer, an in-process, coverage-guided, evolutionary fuzzing engine.

ktool - pip install k2l | Mach-O + Obj-C analysis TUI / CLI kit and library. Zero compiled deps, runs anywhere with a python interpreter.

CrossHair - An analysis tool for Python that blurs the line between testing and type systems.

fapro - Fake Protocol Server

dirsearch - Web path scanner

pwntools - CTF framework and exploit development library

FDsploit - File Inclusion & Directory Traversal fuzzing, enumeration & exploitation tool.

automata - A Python library for simulating finite automata, pushdown automata, and Turing machines

hypothesis - Hypothesis is a powerful, flexible, and easy to use library for property-based testing.

netzob vs scapy boofuzz vs American Fuzzy Lop netzob vs pyinstxtractor boofuzz vs libfuzzer netzob vs ktool boofuzz vs CrossHair netzob vs fapro boofuzz vs dirsearch netzob vs pwntools boofuzz vs FDsploit netzob vs automata boofuzz vs hypothesis