NAPALM VS manuskript

OOTB i would say support what you have and use. Abstract controls to public interfaces that would allow people to write their own modules for their own equipment and software. Kind of like how NAPALM does it, but more (if that makes sense).

Yes. My team uses ansible/NAPALM to automate network device mgmt and configs. Everything is automated and deployed with CI/CD.

I want to use Manuskript (https://github.com/olivierkes/manuskript) since the novella that I am writing is not very linear, so I though this program will help me. Instead of trying to write on Ms. Word or G-docs.

A free writing tool that I use (a lot) is Manuskript (works well on both Windows and Linux): https://github.com/olivierkes/manuskript

I'll jump on the wagon to promote manuskript. It's technically still in alpha, but it's functional enough to work with, and getting more people interested might help the development. It's open source and cross-platform and has lots of interesting features (some of which I still don't know how to use).

More information here: https://github.com/olivierkes/manuskript/issues/942

Manuskript is a good writing tool imo.

Manuskript

I suggest either Manuskript or, as mentioned, Scrivener. If you can deal with the Markdown formatting, Obsidian is an extremely powerful solution, albeit at a steep learning curve.

Manuskript - planner and organization tool for writing; keep track of details