nanocrawler VS npass

This touches on payment ids which is historically a sore spot with Nano. Without running a full node and using unique receiving addresses, verifying payments is hard to do. That said, there are work arounds. You can leverage the NanoCrawler apis and check pending blocks for unique transaction amounts (add tx id at end of raw transaction amount). In fact thats how Nano.to is verifying payments in the backend (unless he started up his own node).

https://nanocrawler.cc/ no transactions is occurring.

Ok, then, look at the network. Transactions don’t match market-cap price. If XNO was truly $2.82 you would see much bigger transactions on the network. Recent transactions are almost always x10-3 https://nanocrawler.cc/

Look up the public address you have on 2miners on nanocrawler.cc or a similar site. It most probably it says the transactions are ready to be received.

I personally think the best project in crypto for money use( ideology ) is Nano but the used of nano right now is so small (https://nanocrawler.cc ) we average less than 1 tx/s of use . So we are a big community but nobody use the network.

You can find the tx hash on https://nanolooker.com/ or https://nanocrawler.cc/.

That being said please remember to give credit to NanoCrawler and the wonderful APIs they made

Receiving funds while your seed is safe and offline is easy: You can just generate some addresses from your seed while on the offline machine and hand them out as usual. You can see what people are sending to these addresses by watching them at services like https://nanocrawler.cc. It starts to become more difficult once you want to pocket your funds, set your representative or withdraw funds. This is where offline signing comes into play.

🙏🏻 Thank you for asking. Perhaps something that plays well with https://github.com/tjl-dev/npass?

Out of curiosity for your future digital marketplace project, have you tried out nPass? The user experience was quite interesting, having a wallet that interacts with web pages to pay for content and holds access tokens for those payments.

One of them: https://npass.dev/npass Or go to nanolinks.info and search "extension"

I'm using nPass, which admittedly is in beta. However, I didn't think it was possible for this kind of thing to happen, i.e. a block submitted under the wrong rep. The next question is this: who is my voting weight seated with now? The rep that I explicitly set with a "change" block, or the rep added in the field of the subsequent "send" block?

Also, look into npass as it may solve some of the wallet issues you are experiencing. https://github.com/tjl-dev/npass