nanocrawler VS nanowallet

This touches on payment ids which is historically a sore spot with Nano. Without running a full node and using unique receiving addresses, verifying payments is hard to do. That said, there are work arounds. You can leverage the NanoCrawler apis and check pending blocks for unique transaction amounts (add tx id at end of raw transaction amount). In fact thats how Nano.to is verifying payments in the backend (unless he started up his own node).

https://nanocrawler.cc/ no transactions is occurring.

Ok, then, look at the network. Transactions don’t match market-cap price. If XNO was truly $2.82 you would see much bigger transactions on the network. Recent transactions are almost always x10-3 https://nanocrawler.cc/

Look up the public address you have on 2miners on nanocrawler.cc or a similar site. It most probably it says the transactions are ready to be received.

I personally think the best project in crypto for money use( ideology ) is Nano but the used of nano right now is so small (https://nanocrawler.cc ) we average less than 1 tx/s of use . So we are a big community but nobody use the network.

You can find the tx hash on https://nanolooker.com/ or https://nanocrawler.cc/.

That being said please remember to give credit to NanoCrawler and the wonderful APIs they made

Receiving funds while your seed is safe and offline is easy: You can just generate some addresses from your seed while on the offline machine and hand them out as usual. You can see what people are sending to these addresses by watching them at services like https://nanocrawler.cc. It starts to become more difficult once you want to pocket your funds, set your representative or withdraw funds. This is where offline signing comes into play.

I'm hoping to do just that, build a test mobile wallet, sometime in the near future (https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet)

I was planning on testing this out sometime in the future by building it into a privacy-minded mobile wallet: https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet

Practically speaking, most wallet applications are dependent on a node to know the state of the ledger. The natrium wallet is connected to the natrium node. The nault wallet randomly chooses a node from a pool of nodes but can be configured to connect to any node. It is possible to design a wallet that doesn't rely on a node and instead connects directly to the network and maintains its own perspective on the state of the ledger locally. I hope to make a proof of concept of that at some point in the near future. This is how the nanollet wallet worked.

I know u/t3rr0r will be working on a privacy-focused wallet similar to what Samourai does for BTC. You can see a proof of concept here: https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet

Nano wallets can have multiple addresses as well. Nothing about the nano network limits a user or wallet developer to using one account/address, it is a choice. This is an area that needs more development as nano privacy wallets can become much more friendly, which is why I started this experiment.

Privacy focused mobile wallet — https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet/

Nano has an interesting advantage to explore layer two and wallet based privacy solutions given its lack of fees and ease of making transactions. I've started working on a wallet as a testing bed for these strategies. I'm aware of Nanofusion and other trustless mixing strategies for other pseudonomous projects (coinjoin and cashfusion). Please share any strategies and ideas on privacy solutions to avoid reinventing the wheel.