mtk-easy-su VS OkHttp

could be possible with MTK easy su

:// that won't work.... The tutorial is made automatically by a bot. Try this

Link to download

But since it uses a MediaTek SoC, you may be able to use MTK easy su to root it

Alternatively, you can try Mtk Easy Su, but I'm not sure if it'll work.

First things first I rooted my oppo f3 with This method

Managed to root it using This any build prop tweaks I can use to increase its Wi-Fi range or maybe increment internet speed also it heat up.

With mediatek we get mtk-su. A useful utility for gaining temporary root privileges from any bog standard shell. (Really nice not having to connect to the internet to please kingroot) So if the boot process is locked down its possible this could work. I believe the the thread on the zte pixi mentions something about this Or maybe im thinking of a different cheap mediatek phone.

We will use Square’s Mock Webserver to spin up a mock server which we can use to simulate real api's request to the get coffee endpoint.

OkHttp Documentation

mockwebserver -> https://github.com/square/okhttp/tree/master/mockwebserver

I searched in the OkHttp GitHub project for an advice on which values may be suitable for Android apps nowadays but found no answers (only this old issue which does not help). Since we share a single OkHttp client Singleton for all our retrofit APIs and even Coil, I wonder if the default 5 maxRequestsPerHost is really enough.

You can technically add a Content-Length header for each part. It's not forbidden by the RFC, but nor is it common. It caused [problems](https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/2138) for OkHttp, and they eventually removed it. Might be fine for internal-only use, though.

Boundaries are a lot like UUIDs, and rely on the same logic. When generating random data, once you have enough bits, the odds are against that sequence of bits ever having been generated before in the universe.

Lets be specific. This is the gradle build file for Squares okhttp client library. How exactly would your bld tool "predict" or "help" with all the parameters needed? There is no need to be defensive. Replace those large build files with your own, show where your approach is better and then understanding will lead to better solutions.

And adding to that: The asynchttpclient library is just a thin wrapper around OkHttp3, so it might be easier to just go with that instead: https://square.github.io/okhttp/

Retrofit in combination with OkHttp for fetching data from server (which hopefully already exists)

OkHttp