Module Linker VS just

# Palindrome project Project used to explain my view on a django project architecture ## Tools, libs, etc. Some time related files. Versions on Poetry. - [Python](https://www.python.org/) Programming languange - [django-environ](https://django-environ.readthedocs.io) Manage .envs in Django - [Poetry](https://python-poetry.org/) Python packaging and dependency management - poetry.lock - pyproject.toml - [Django](https://www.djangoproject.com/) Web framework written in Python - [Docker](https://www.docker.com/) Manage containers for dev environment - compose.yaml - compose/dev/Dockerfile - compose/dev/start - .env - [Just](https://just.systems/) encapsulate commands for easier use - justfile ## Dev environment setup 1. Install Just, Docker and Poetry(opcional). 2. Copy .env.example to .env, no need for edtion. 3. Certified that docker is up and running 4. `$ just build` ## Run the server for development 1. Certified that docker is up and running 2. `$ just runserver` You can access on http://0.0.0.0:8000/

We heavily use Just at OpenSauced, a command runner utility, much like GNU’s “make”, for easily executing small scripts. This has enabled us to quickly onramp new team members or community members to our Go ecosystem since building and testing is as simple as “just build” or “just test”!

> If I had to submit one tip it would be to set everything up with a Makefile or similar.

If I had to submit a tip on top of yours, it's to use justfiles instead of Makefiles :-)

https://github.com/casey/just

If you’re going to use make, use just instead:

https://github.com/casey/just

My first thought was that that was dropping one of the main features of make.

On reflection though, the timestamp dependant part isn't really something used much nowadays apart from compiling C.

It'd be cool if it was an opt-in feature for just files so that it could actually function as a replacement for make in all cases.

I went looking in the docs and found this[0] which I'd missed last time I looked into justfiles.

[0] https://github.com/casey/just?tab=readme-ov-file#what-are-th...

Most projects I've worked on included a bunch of scripts for common tasks (installing dependencies, starting/stopping dev servers, testing and deploying changes, and so on). There are a few tools designed for this, such as Just (https://just.systems/) and Task (https://taskfile.dev/), and I know some people use Make as a task runner (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40333481), but I've always preferred the simplicity and universality of shell scripts.

Bin CLI is a tool I wrote to add some of the niceties of these tools to shell scripts: it works even when you're currently in a subdirectory, only requires you to type enough of the command (script) name to uniquely identify it, and allows aliases to be defined. It also allows a project's commands to be listed (along with some help text), supports subcommands, and supports tab completion of command names. Of course scripts can be written in other languages too, just by adding the appropriate shebang.

Collaborators/contributors who don't have Bin CLI installed can just run the scripts directly - so I can enjoy the benefits without adding a hard dependency or extra barrier to entry. However, I also added support for defining one-liner scripts/aliases in a config file (much like "npm run" scripts are defined in package.json) for times when I want to avoid creating many trivial/wrapper scripts for common tasks.

It is implemented as a single Bash script, with minimal dependencies, small enough to keep in my Dotfiles repo (62 KB). I also made .deb and .rpm packages so it can easily be installed system-wide.

I find `just` to be better suited than `make` for this use case: https://github.com/casey/just

The siblings comment is good too, and often I'll put all the various commands into a subdir, and `just` is just an interface to that, particularly so if the script gets complex.

Then, `just` is really a signal "hey, this repo supports this interface" and things like `just -l` for discoverability.