mkdnflow.nvim VS logseq

I like logseq for knowledge management and tasks. And since it's all plain markdown files they are easy to quickly open and search in nvim. https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim is really nice for this because it can follow the internal links and create new pages.

I've been planning to switch to https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim and re-write the function that creates diary pages, and the functions that cycle/navigate to next/prev diary pages, so that they work in subdirs... for example: main wiki is ~/diary and the main diary is in the root of that wiki and I want to be able to flexibly create dated files in any subdir without making that its own wiki so like in ~/diary/subdirxyz/2023-03-17.mkd the nextDay() function (whatever it's called) would look for next dated file only inside subdirxyz.

There are some cool features we've talked about adding to mkdnflow.nvim!!!

https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim is a similar plugin to neorg that's closer to vimwiki than to org-mode. Either way, a personal documentation system, and whatever report/scripts/grep to find things easily.

Did you see https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim/ mentioned here? I think that's the winner here (though I admit I have bias against even considering zettlekesten/zk merely due to its name: in computing we call that a wiki).

My markdown plugin mkdnflow does this (among other things). If you’re not looking for any functionality except toggling checkboxes, you could take a look at the lists module lists.lua and search for the function toggleToDo() (and those it relies on).

I'm using zk-nvim with markdown lsp, markdown / markdown_inline Treesitter and MKDNFLOW for my notes and tasks. This all works great and I also created this shortcut to archive selected lines to a different file

I use mkdnflow.nvim for taking notes in markdown. It is simple, and you can easily create and follow links.

I use markdown for all of my notes inside of Neovim and have a few custom macros and shortcuts, and heavily use iamcco's [MarkdownPreview](https://github.com/iamcco/markdown-preview.nvim) along with jakewvincent's [MkdnFlow](https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim).

Not sure what exactly you mean by editing lists and tables with ease, but my plugin https://github.com/jakewvincent/mkdnflow.nvim might check some of those boxes. What list and table editing features would be must-haves for you?

Logseq support via our Logseq Plugin

Sorry, but _what exactly_ «it seems to do» from your point of view?

My «second brain» now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many computers and mobile devices. And (last but not least) it works: it allows me to solve my tasks way more faster than with the assistant of external, non-personalized tools (like ChatGPT, StackExchange or Google).

I know no tools for all this tasks except org-mode. Well, maybe Evernote in the 2010-s was something similar — but with less features, with more bugs and with worse interface.

Personal note-taking _is_ a complex task per se (well, at least for someone like typical HN visitor). I've seen many note-taking tools, that were ridiculously featureless, stupid and inconvenient because they were _not_ complex enough.

> Sure if one wants to do emacs-gardening it is fine.

1)You can use org-mode outside Emacs. See for example Logseq (https://logseq.com/), organice (https://organice.200ok.ch/) or EasyOrg.

2)Org-mode works in Emacs out of the box, you don't need any «emacs-gardening» to use org-mode.

3)The term «Emacs-gardening» itself sound a bit like hate-speech for me. The complexity of Emacs customization is overrated, mostly due to opinions of people who never used Emacs or used it in the previous millennium.

Obsidian is great.

For those looking for an open source alternative (or don't want to pay the Obsidian fees for professional usage) check out Logseq: https://logseq.com/

For an opensource alternative to Obsidian checkout Logseq (1). I spent a while thinking obsidian was opensource out of my own ignorance and was disappointed when I learned it was not.

1: https://logseq.com/

I use logseq to keep journal of my daily work.

While Emacs and Org mode can certainly be used for this (and, when they can't, you can always inject little python/js scripts in your emacs config to take care of specific things), I'd also recommend you take a look at Logseq.