microcosm VS Alpine.js

Manual via https://pkg.go.dev/database/sql with handwritten SQL in the majority of places... but with a wrapper to handle the more complex search scenarios.

For example these from a multi-tenant SaaS forum platform...

This helper to get connections: https://github.com/microcosm-cc/microcosm/blob/master/helper... used like this for inserts: https://github.com/microcosm-cc/microcosm/blob/master/models... and this for reads https://github.com/microcosm-cc/microcosm/blob/master/models... .

But searches... i.e. highly consistent SELECT queries with different WHERE statements (and potentially FROM statements), then in each project I tend to have an idea of a search struct ( https://github.com/microcosm-cc/microcosm/blob/master/models... ) that will validate the inputs and represent the search query, and then something that will consume that and build the SQL for it ( https://github.com/microcosm-cc/microcosm/blob/master/models... ). This isn't pretty... but it's easy for me to tune, debug, and keeps the rest of the code base very maintainable... all the complexity is here in the search.

The vast majority of SQL is very very simple and needs no ORM, and the complexity is just in the search scenario where I want to be able to tune the performance more than an ORM would allow me to do so.

Alpine.js for reactive frontend

✨ In recent months, I have been developing web projects using GOTTHA stack: Go + Templ + Tailwind CSS + htmx + Alpine.js. As soon as I'm ready to talk about all the subtleties and pitfalls, I'll post it on my social networks.

> But honestly, torn towards htmx but undecided.

We are in the middle of migrating from our monster react application into server rendered pages (with jinja2). The velocity at which we are able to ship and the reduction of complexity has been great so far.

Managing client side state for simple things like (is the dropdown open/closed), listening to keyboard events and such can be done with something like alpine-js [1] without all the baggage that something like react brings.

It appears this is already the trend with JS frameworks too - with server side rendering being the new norm.

[1] https://alpinejs.dev/

Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others.

Direct DOM, but with a library. Specifically AlpineJS since it follows Vue closely in design practices allowing me to scale into a full web application if necessary (basically swapping to Vue takes minimal work). The Morph plugin is specifically what I like using.

If you want more details on the initial setup I encourage you to take a look at the Part I that covers more of the initial implementation. For this portion, I added Prisma as an ORM, a frontend style library called Tachyons, and AlpineJS to handle any client-side interactions. I did this to avoid needing to add a client-side bundler to the build and instead just rely on plain old module imports to compose the frontend. This is now the default for Rails and it is quite nice to not need any additional build tools for the client.

- [swallow-pywebview](https://github.com/rangwea/swallow-pywebview)： Base on [pywebview](https://pywebview.flowrl.com/) using Python，the frontend base on [alpinejs](https://alpinejs.dev/) and [tailwindcss](https://tailwindcss.com/)。

If you’ve followed our other tutorials, you might be familiar with Alpine.js. It’s a lightweight JavaScript library that allows you to add interactivity to your site without writing a single line of JavaScript. It’s incredibly easy to use, and we’ll show you how to make the animation trigger when the user scrolls to it.

The approach is not new, essentially a variation of Knockout, Alpine, and similar "JS-in-HTML" approaches.