metadata VS AdGuardHome

Which list is blocking archive.org? If "NextDNS Ads & Trackers Blocklist", probably some kind of mistake, write about it - https://github.com/nextdns/metadata/issues

You can find the NextDNS lists here: https://github.com/nextdns/metadata

You can always look at github. This is just the activity for their metadata repo: https://github.com/nextdns/metadata/commits/masterFeel free to check their other repos.

NextDNS gives you a whole bunch of 3rd party filters, maintained by random dudes in Github repos as a hobby. We support some of them too in the "3rd party filters" tab, however we don't encourage anyone to actually use them, as we have our own Native filters, that we've built up over the course of 5 years based on feedback for millions of Windscribe (our sister company) users. Our native filters are highly effective, and prone to much fewer false positives. We recommend you try them, you will be pleasantly surprised with how they perform. I guarantee you that you will spend 90% less time making whitelist rules for false blocks... or your money back :) "Native tracking protection" filters are all part of the IoT Filter. NextDNS has the individual toggles, which enforce this small set of rules. Out IoT filter enforces all of them, as well as 10x more things.

Here is the list: https://github.com/nextdns/metadata/blob/master/parentalcontrol/categories/video-streaming.json

Here's those native blocking lists from NextDNS: https://github.com/nextdns/metadata/tree/master/privacy/native

From https://github.com/nextdns/metadata/blob/master/privacy/blocklists/energized-ultimate.json the link used is https://block.energized.pro/ultimate/formats/domains.txt which currently contains nothing but comments.

Also AdGuardhome will use optimistic caching, which is great.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/4002#...

The main repo is GPLv3: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

They already have many other commercials products and I guess also the default filter rules are very good because of their experience in the domain.

But I think you can use it completely without the AdGuard servers and use other filter list sources.

How it compares to let's say AdGuard Home? Seems similar https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Adguardhome - Clients identification issue

You can check this documentation if you want to investigate further: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki/Hosts-Blocklists

I'm using adguardhome v0.107.42 openwrt snapshot on linksys wrt1900ac v2, but when using DoH it won't resolve upstream DNS, but DoT is works perfectly OK, I've already set allow_unencrypted_doh to true in config .yaml file as per instruction here

AdGuard Home?

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Regarding open source, AdGuard DNS actually is:

How does this compare to adguard home [ https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardHome ] ??

Have you looked at AdGuard Home - Configuring clients?