meta-package-manager VS lf

Something like Meta Package Manager? https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager

I use https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager

The result: https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager/commit/3ab...

Source: https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager/

With regular snapshots you can at least eliminate new installed software as the root cause of an issue. Doesn't solve the issue with preferences though.

and let it figure out which package manager to use to install your package.

The project is open-source: https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager#readme

This CLI has some other capabilities, like listing the duplicate packages on your system:

    $ mpm list --duplicates

Potentially somewhat answering my own question (but not completely; i am still interested in your answer) you might be interested in https://github.com/kdeldycke/meta-package-manager is it along the same lines?

A very good alternative to ranger is lf https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

It's a lot faster in all aspects, has mostly the same features and is pretty much a standalone binary.

I've tried using LF in the past, but it didn't stick. Will definitely give this a go, as I'm trying to move to an pure terminal workflow as closely as possible.

https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

Hi. fff, lf, clifm Won't say they're best or not, rather interesting and maybe worth looking at. Looked up for the z in termux's repos and it's called "zoxide" there.

in the Github page for lf under etc, you can find instruction for making such a function for bash and fish.

I recently discovered an amazing terminal file manager (lf). The package is available for most mainstream distros but not for openSUSE.

For me, the main program missing is "lf" the ranger inspired terminal file manager. 5000 stars on Github, packaged in the official repos for basically anything under the sun except Fedora and a key part in my day-to-day workflow. https://github.com/gokcehan/lf