mergerfs VS fd

Have a look at mergerfs.

I am planning to use ubuntu server, and I would like to ask an advice: according to snapraid's download page and mergerfs' github page, it seems to be suggested to download directly their source instead of using ubuntu's package manager.

Like most people on r/homelab, it started out with Plex. Rough timeline/services below:

0. Got a Synology DS413 with 4x WD Red 3TB drives. Use Playstation Media Server to stream videos from it. Eventually find some Busybox stuff to add various functionality to the NAS, but it had a habit of undoing them periodically, which was frustrating. I also experienced my first and (knock on wood) only drive failure during this time, which concluded without fanfare once the faulty drive was replaced, and the array repaired itself.

1. While teaching self Python as an Electrical Distribution Engineer at a utility, I befriended the IT head, who gave me an ancient (I think Nehalem? Quad-core Xeon) Dell T310. Promptly got more drives, totaling 7, and tried various OS / NAS platforms. I had OpenMediaVault for a while, but got tired of the UI fighting me when I knew how to do things in shell, so I switched to Debian (which it's based on anyway). Moved to MergerFS [0] + SnapRAID [1] for storage management, and Plex for media. I was also tinkering with various Linux stuff on it constantly.

1.1 Got tired of my tinkering breaking things and requiring troubleshooting/fixing (in retrospect, this provided excellent learning), so I installed Proxmox, reinstalled Debian, and made a golden image with everything set up as desired so I could easily revert.

1.2 A friend told me about Docker. I promptly moved Plex over to it, and probably around this time also got the *Arr Stack [2] going.

2. Got a Supermicro X9DRi-LN4F+ in a 2U chassis w/ 12x 3.5" bays. Got faster/bigger CPUs (E5-2680v2), more RAM, more drives, etc. Shifted container management to Docker Compose. Modded the BIOS to allow it to boot from a NVMe drive on a PCIe adapter.

2.1 Shifted to ZFS on Debian. Other than DKMS occasionally losing its mind during kernel upgrades, this worked well.

2.2 Forked [3] some [4] Packer/Ansible projects to suit my needs, made a VM for everything. NAS, Dev, Webserver, Docker host, etc. Other than outgrowing (IMO) MergerFS/SnapRAID, honestly at this point I could have easily stopped, and could to this day revert back to this setup. It was dead reliable and worked extremely well. IIRC I was also playing with Terraform at this time.

2.3 Successfully broke into tech (Associate SRE) as a mid-career shift, due largely (according to the hiring manager) to what I had done with my homelab. Hooray for hobbies paying off.

3. Got a single Dell R620. I think the idea was to install either pfSense or VyOS on it, but that never came to fruition. Networking was from a Unifi USG (their tiny router + firewall + switch) and 8-port switch, with some AC Pro APs.

4. Got two more R620s. Kubernetes all the things. Each one runs Proxmox in a 3-node cluster with two VMs - a control plane, and worker.

4.0.1 Perhaps worth noting here that I thoroughly tested my migration plan via spinning up some VMs in, IIRC, Digital Ocean that mimicked my home setup. I successfully ran it twice, which was good enough for me.

4.1 Played with Ceph via Rook, but a. disliked (and still to this day) running storage for everything out of K8s b. kept getting clock skew between nodes. Someone on Reddit mentioned it was my low-power C-state settings, but since that was saving me something like ~50 watts/node, I didn't want to deal with the higher power/heat. I landed on Longhorn [5] for cluster storage (i.e. anything that wasn't being handled by the ZFS pool), which was fine, but slow. SATA SSDs (used Intel enterprise drives with PLP, if you're wondering) over GBe aren't super fast, but they should be able to exceed 30 MBps.

4.1.1 Again, worth noting that I spent literally a week poring over every bit of Ceph documentation I could find, from the Red Hat stuff to random Wikis and blog posts. It's not something you just jump into, IMO, and most of the horror stories I read boiled down to "you didn't follow the recommended practices."

5. Got a newer Supermicro, an X11SSH-F, thinking that it would save power consumption over the older dual-socket I had for the NAS. It turned out to not make a big difference. For some reason I don't recall, I had a second X9DRi-LN4F+ mobo, so I sold the other one with the faster CPUs, bought some cheaper CPUs for the other one, and bought more drives for it. It's now a backup target that boots up daily to ingest ZFS snapshots. I have 100% on-site backups for everything. Important things (i.e. anything that I can't get from a torrent) are also off-site.

6. Got some Samsung PM863 NVMe SSDs mounted on PCIe adapters for the Dells, and set up Ceph, but this time handled by Proxmox. It's dead easy, and for whatever reason isn't troubled by the same clock skew issues as I had previously. Still in the process of shifting cluster storage from Longhorn, but I have been successfully using Ceph block storage as fast (1 GBe, anyway - a 10G switch is on the horizon) storage for databases.

So specifically, you asked what I do with the hardware. What I do, as far as my family is concerned, is block ads and serve media. On a more useful level, I try things out related to my job, most recently database-related (I moved from SRE to DBRE a year ago). I have MySQL and Postgres running, and am constantly playing with them. Can you actually do a live buffer pool resize in MySQL? (yes) Is XFS actually faster than ext4 for large DROP TABLE operations? (yes, but not by much) Is it faster to shut down a MySQL server and roll back to a previous ZFS snapshot than to rollback a big transaction? (often yes, although obviously a full shutdown has its own problems) Does Postgres suffer from the same write performance issue as MySQL with random PKs like UUIDv4, despite not clustering by default? (yes, but not to the same extent - still enough to matter, and you should use UUIDv7 if you absolutely need them)

I legitimately love this stuff. I could quite easily make do without a fancy enclosed rack and multiple servers, but I like them, so I have them. The fact that it tends to help my professional growth out at the same time is a bonus.

[0]: https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs

[1]: https://www.snapraid.it

[2]: https://wiki.servarr.com

[3]: https://github.com/stephanGarland/packer-proxmox-templates

[4]: https://github.com/stephanGarland/ansible-initial-server

[5]: https://longhorn.io

it seems similar to mergerfs https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs . I havent gone through any code to verify but this is what it seems like

Something else to try is mergerfs, https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs

I use mergerfs for my Google drive, Dropbox and local drives to appear as a single folder structure on my server so my plex doesn't require multiple mappings.

ripgrep: A super-fast file searcher. You can install it using your system's package manager (e.g., brew install ripgrep on macOS). fd: Another blazing-fast file finder. Installation instructions can be found here: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd

hyperfine is such a great tool that it's one of the first I reach for when doing any sort of benchmarking.

I encourage anyone who's tried hyperfine and enjoyed it to also look at sharkdp's other utilities, they're all amazing in their own right with fd[1] being the one that perhaps get the most daily use for me and has totally replaced my use of find(1).

[1]: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd

You call it with `n` and get an interactive fuzzy search for your directories. If you do `n ` instead, it’ll start the find with `` already filled in (and if there’s only one match, jump to it directly). The `ls` is optional but I find that I like having the contents visible as soon as I change a directory.

I’m also including iCloud Drive but excluding the Library directory as that is too noisy. I have a separate `nl` function which searches just inside `~/Library` for when I need it, as well as other specialised `n` functions that search inside specific places that I need a lot.

¹ https://github.com/sharkdp/fd

² https://github.com/junegunn/fzf

Many (most?) of them have been overhauled with success. For find there is fd[1]. There's batcat, exa (ls), ripgrep, fzf, atuin (history), delta (diff) and many more.

Most are both backwards compatible and fresh and friendly. Your hardwon muscle memory still of good use. But there's sane flags and defaults too. It's faster, more colorful (if you wish), better integration with another (e.g. exa/eza or aware of git modifications). And, in my case, often features I never knew I needed (atuin sync!, ripgrep using gitignore).

1 https://github.com/sharkdp/fd

Descubra mais sobre o fd em: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd

AFAIK there is a find replacement with sane defaults: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd , a lot of people I know love it.

However, I already have this in my muscle memory:

fd

> without zsh globs I have to remember find syntax

My "solution" to this is using https://github.com/sharkdp/fd (even when in zsh and having glob support). I'm not sure if using a tool that's not present by default would be suitable for your use cases, but if you're considering alternate shells, I suspect you might be

Nice to see other alternatives to find. I personally use fd (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) a lot, as I find the UX much better. There is one thing that I think could be better, around the difference between "wanting to list all files that follow a certain pattern" and "wanting to find one or a few specific files". Technically, those are the same, but an issue I'll often run into is wanting to search something in dotfiles (for example the Go tools), use the unrestricted mode, and it'll find the few files I'm looking for, alongside hundreds of files coming from some cache/backup directory somewhere. This happens even more with rg, as it'll look through the files contents.

I'm not sure if this is me not using the tool how I should, me not using Linux how I should, me using the wrong tool for this job, something missing from the tool or something else entirely. I wonder if other people have this similar "double usage issue", and I'm interested in ways to avoid it.