meander VS fib

In this meeting, we had an overview of the Meander toolset for transparent data transformations. It was mostly a hands-on demo & discussion by the author, Joel Holdbrooks.

The third monthly meeting will be at the end of September and will be dedicated to Meander.

It might be overkill but I saw that you use hashes and are probably trying to do pattern matching on objects; have you seen: meander?

Meander is good at shape-rotating if that's what you're asking https://github.com/noprompt/meander/

I would mention meander for pattern matching and term rewriting https://github.com/noprompt/meander

meander might be worth a look.

You might find meander interesting as well.

I've typically found rust to be about 100x faster than Python for the projects I've ported. This is consistent with https://github.com/drujensen/fib.

Here is a similar benchmark but includes compile times. https://github.com/drujensen/fib

How? Do you mean how do I know it's slow? Because it takes longer to run.

Write a typical computation such as Fibonacci in Java and Erlang/Elixir and compare. Fortunately someone has already done this.

Elixir is 3x slower than C and 2x slower than Java for this single thread example.

https://github.com/drujensen/fib

Apparently this upsets people for me to point this out. However, I did not say that Elixir was slow in general or a bad choice. It's an excellent choice for problems which suit parallelization or which require reliable, consistent performance.

Since the parent poster had commented that adding this multi-module dispatch would not be performant, I merely pointed out that the single thread peformance was already slow (as in, why worry too much about the performance cost of the multi dispatch suggestion).

Is there some advantage over repos that also show the results ?