manageiq VS grucloud

I mean, I get that deprecating products can be annoying. But at the same time, we're talking about a for profit company. There does need to be a level of customer interest to make the maths work. Just because Red Hat doesn't have a productised version doesn't mean you can't use it though. There is always an upstream version of Red Hat products, in the case of CloudForms, that community is ManageIQ: https://www.manageiq.org

For this things (self-service portal where users can order new kubernetes cluster or vm, reserve IP address, create DNS record...) we using https://www.manageiq.org, but for some cases you need heavy customization so we looking for replacement. Last time when I checked https://backstage.io looks good.

Using ManageIQ (aka CloudForms)

Just putting this here.

I wrote an open source tool called grucloud that can also list the asset inventory, check it out at www.grucloud.com

Check it out at https://www.grucloud.com/

I wrote a birectional infrastructure as code, where the code is generated automatically from a live infrastructure (aws, azure, gcp). Let me know your feedback on this open source tool, available at www.grucloud.com

Yes indeed, yaml and json are not suited for describing infrastructure. Off the self programming languages provide conditionals, loops and so on. I wrote an alternative to CDK/terraform called www.grucloud.com, check it out.

Dig into www.grucloud.com, an alternative to terraform/cdk/pulumi. However, the code is generated automatically forme your current live infrastructure, no need to manually write infrastructure as code.

Have a look at www.grucloud.com, an alternative to Terraform/CDK/pulumi. Instead of manually writing the code, grucloud can generate code from live infrastructures: AWS, Azure and GCP.

The local module defining the app on the k8s side is located at base.

The command gc graph generates this diagram from the code iac.js.