turbo VS FINAL CUT

https://github.com/magiblot/turbo which is built using Turbo Vision framework

also https://github.com/magiblot/turbo

Turbo - editor made using TurboVision, with support for Unicode: https://github.com/magiblot/turbo

Show them this, too:

https://github.com/magiblot/turbo

Applications like tvedit were designed for MS-DOS, which offered full interaction with the mouse and keyboard, and many of them were commercial products aimed at a general audience. TUI applications from the Unix tradition, however, were designed for use in terminals with limited capabilities, and were aimed at more technical users (or were created by the users themselves).

User-friendly TUI applications in MS-DOS were succeeded by Windows applications, while the largest revolution in the last 20 years in Unix TUIs has been the widespread support of 256/24-bit colors and UTF-8. Hence the gap in usability between the two worlds.

Scintilla provides a few default platform adapters: GTK, Qt, Win32, etc. In order to have it work in a terminal application, I just wrote my own adapter.

PSA: Not Apple's Final Cut, but rather this:

https://github.com/gansm/finalcut

Visit the GitHub repository to get the latest version.

Maybe FINAL CUT is something for you. It has its own widgets and can be controlled with the mouse or keyboard.

The reason for my posting is not the XPM viewer. The primary reason was the data processing class, which allows you to display logos or other simple graphics in your programs.

I implemented for FINAL CUT a simple data processing class and an image viewer for X PixMap (XPM) images. It allows displaying XPM icons in the terminal. Maybe someone will find it helpful.

If you want to write in C++, you can have a look at my small TUI framework FINAL CUT.