maddpg VS gpt-2

I'm using the MADDPG algorithm from https://github.com/openai/maddpg/blob/master/maddpg/trainer/maddpg.py. I understood the forward pass for both the actor and critic networks. I'm not able to understand how the actor and critic networks are updates. Like at line 188 and 191 the authors compute the critic loss and actor loss. But can anyone explain how the critic and actor networks are updated. Also, as far as I understand, when the number of agents increases from 3 to 6 for a simple spread policy in MADDPG, the computation time for Q loss and P loss at lines 188 and 191 increase super-linearly. I'm assuming this might be because both the Q loss and P loss utilize the Q values and the dimension to calculate the Q values increases with the number of increasing linearly. It would be great if anyone can help me to understand this back propagation phase much better and why does the computation time grow super-linearly. I also put a time counter to track the computation time of Q loss and P loss for 60,000 episodes with simple spread policy (3 agents, 3 landmarks, 0 adversaries). Thanks for the help, in advance! **Q loss** 3 agents 74.31 sec 6 agents 243.31 sec (3X) **P loss** 3 agents 114.86 sec 6 agents 321.76 sec (3x)

Another thing is that I don't use only one centralized critic, I'm using one for each agent (they are all centralized), you could use parameter sharing for the ones of the same type if you want. A great start would be to look at how the MADDPG works in an implementation (original, tf2 ,pytorch-1 , pytorch-2 ), then you can see how it is the training of the actor and the critic and just adapt the ideas to your MA-PPO implementation.

Medium models: Roughly between 1B to 10B parameters. This is where Mistral 7B, Phi-3, Gemma from Google DeepMind, and wizardlm2 sit. Fun fact: GPT 2 was a medium sized model, much smaller than its latest versions.

"Our model, called GPT-2 (a successor to GPT), was trained simply to predict the next word in 40GB of Internet text. Due to our concerns about malicious applications of the technology, we are not releasing the trained model. As an experiment in responsible disclosure, we are instead releasing a much smaller model for researchers to experiment with, as well as a technical paper. "

They did release GPT-2 under the MIT License.

Did you arrive at this certainty through reading something other than what OpenAI has published? The document [0] that describes the training data for GPT-2 makes this assertion hilarious to me.

[0]: https://github.com/openai/gpt-2/blob/master/model_card.md#da...

I made a clone of https://github.com/openai/gpt-2 on my local laptop