macro-lisp VS fut

Rust’s macro system is safe and hygienic, people have implemented lisps in it. I just did a google search to find an example, so I have no idea how well supported this is, https://github.com/JunSuzukiJapan/macro-lisp

You can already have both: https://github.com/JunSuzukiJapan/macro-lisp

Via a lisp macro?

Rust macros can make the language look like anything, even lisp: https://github.com/JunSuzukiJapan/macro-lisp

Why not get the best (?) of both worlds with the macro-lisp crate: https://github.com/JunSuzukiJapan/macro-lisp

A small snippet from the project's examples shows minimal boilerplate between Rust and a native-looking Lisp experience:

After that, I'm going to go back to working on adding some scripting. My attempts at making a Lisp in Rust failed spectacularly, but when trying to find a ready made replacement that's not too big (so not RustPython and not Rhai or Dyon) I found mentions of DSL, which are usually Rust macros, which led me to https://github.com/JunSuzukiJapan/macro-lisp (single file, circa 400 lines, that does basically the whole job I want, i.e. being able to call Rust functions when I need them, e.g. from an in-game console)

I've just learned that Ć is no longer a viable name (thankfully). Now it's Fusion Programming Language (or fut?) https://github.com/fusionlanguage/fut

Interesting unrelated find: one of the implementations is written in “Ć” which transpiles cleanly into multiple languages: https://github.com/pfusik/cito

For some reason, I recall that Hytale was forked from Manic Digger, which is written in Cito. I could be wrong, but that would mean that Hytale was written in a subset of C# meant to be compiled to other languages.

There is also Ć