wine VS FidelityFX-FSR

002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please don't report bugs about it on winehq.org and use https://github.com/lutris/wine/issues instead.

killall: evmapy: no process killed 2023-02-08 21:38:28,160 ERROR (emulatorlauncher:519):runCommand wineserver: using server-side synchronization. wine: could not open working directory L"C:\\windows\\system32\\", starting in the Windows directory. 002c:fixme:actctx:parse_depend_manifests Could not find dependent assembly L"Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls" (6.0.0.0) 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Lutris Wine 7.2 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please don't report bugs about it on winehq.org and use https://github.com/lutris/wine/issues instead. 002c:err:wineboot:main Cannot set the dir to L"C:\\windows" (2) wine: could not open working directory L"C:\\windows\\system32\\", starting in the Windows directory. 0034:fixme:service:scmdatabase_autostart_services Auto-start service L"MountMgr" failed to start: 2 wine: could not open working directory L"C:\\windows\\system32\\", starting in the Windows directory. 0040:err:ole:com_get_class_object class {ff48dba4-60ef-4201-aa87-54103eef594e} not registered 0040:err:ole:com_get_class_object no class object {ff48dba4-60ef-4201-aa87-54103eef594e} could be created for context 0x1 0040:err:tabtip:create_uia_event_handler Failed to create IUIAutomation interface, hr 0x80040154 002c:err:wineboot:start_tabtip_process Unexpected termination of tabtip.exe - exit code -1 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root\\AppData\\Roaming". 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root". 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root\\AppData\\Local". 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\INetCache". 002c:err:wininet:cache_containers_init Couldn't get path for default container 0 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\History". 002c:err:wininet:cache_containers_init Couldn't get path for default container 1 002c:err:shell:SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirW Failed to create directory L"C:\\users\\root\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\INetCookies". 002c:err:wininet:cache_containers_init Couldn't get path for default container 2 wine: could not load kernel32.dll, status c0000135

Started initial process 2280 from gamemoderun /home/deck/.var/app/net.lutris.Lutris/data/lutris/runners/wine/lutris-fshack-7.2-x86_64/bin/wine /run/media/mmcblk0p1/Games/Spider-man Remastered/Spider-Man.exe gamemoderun %command% Start monitoring process. gamemodeauto: fsync: up and running. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Lutris Wine 7.2 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please don't report bugs about it on winehq.org and use https://github.com/lutris/wine/issues instead. 0118:fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION Setting breakpad minidump AppID = 1817070 SteamInternal_SetMinidumpSteamID: Caching Steam ID: 76561200052953880 [API loaded no] 0118:err:ole:com_get_class_object apartment not initialised 0118:fixme:bcrypt:BCryptGenerateSymmetricKey ignoring object buffer 0118:fixme:bcrypt:BCryptGenerateSymmetricKey ignoring object buffer 0118:fixme:file:NtLockFile I/O completion on lock not implemented yet 0150:fixme:file:NtLockFile I/O completion on lock not implemented yet 0150:fixme:process:SetProcessShutdownParameters (00000100, 00000001): partial stub. 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL_Main_Control_Create cb 0000000141C90800, arg 1 stub! 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL2_Main_Control_Create cb 0000000180006040, arg 1, ptr 00000000005404B8 stub! 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL2_Adapter_NumberOfAdapters_Get ptr 0000000000000000, count 00000000005408D0 stub! 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL2_Graphics_VersionsX2_Get ptr 0000000000000000, ver 000000000011CAD0 stub! 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL_Adapter_NumberOfAdapters_Get count 000000000011D1A4 stub! 0118:fixme:atiadlxx:ADL_Adapter_AdapterInfo_Get adapters 0000000000590060, input_size 1572, stub! wine: Call from 000000007B0124DE to unimplemented function atiadlxx.dll.ADL_Display_DisplayMapConfig_Get, aborting 0084:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (0x4403d0, 0): stub 0084:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0000000000010020, 00000000004403D0): stub 0118:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (0x380750, 1): stub 0118:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0000000000020086, 0000000000380750): stub 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" xme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Button" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"SysTabControl32" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Button" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 010c:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"#32770" 0118:fixme:system:NtUserSystemParametersInfo Unimplemented action: 59 (SPI_SETSTICKYKEYS) 0180:fixme:kernelbase:AppPolicyGetThreadInitializationType FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFA, 00000000648AFF50 01dc:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (00000000000004F0 0): stub 01e8:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (000000000000050C 0): stub 01e4:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (0000000000000500 0): stub 01e0:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (00000000000004F8 0): stub 01ec:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (0000000000000514 0): stub 01f0:fixme:thread:SetThreadIdealProcessor (0000000000000520 0): stub 0234:fixme:pulse:pulse_channel_map_to_channel_mask Unhandled channel aux0 0234:fixme:pulse:pulse_channel_map_to_channel_mask Unhandled channel aux1 0240:fixme:wbemprox:client_security_SetBlanket 00000002419C1DE0, 0000000176A80250, 10, 0, (null), 3, 3, 0000000000000000, 0x00000000 0240:fixme:wbemprox:client_security_Release 00000002419C1DE0 0240:fixme:wbemprox:enum_class_object_Next timeout not supported 026c:fixme:kernelbase:AppPolicyGetThreadInitializationType FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFA, 000000017A35FF50 0118:err:sync:RtlLeaveCriticalSection section 00000001476A80C0 is not acquired 0278:err:kerberos:kerberos_LsaApInitializePackage no Kerberos support, expect problems 01ac:err:seh:call_stack_handlers invalid frame 00007FA29A634300 (00000000669E2000-0000000066AE0000) 01ac:err:seh:NtRaiseException Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. 0150:fixme:kernelbase:AppPolicyGetProcessTerminationMethod FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFA, 000000000011FEB0 Monitored process exited. Initial process has exited (return code: 1280) Exit with return code 1280

Started initial process 57769 from /home/***/.local/share/lutris/runners/wine/lutris-7.2-2-x86_64/bin/wine /home/***/Games/lineage-ii/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Lineage II/system/L2.exe Start monitoring process. fsync: up and running. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Lutris Wine 7.2 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please don't report bugs about it on winehq.org and use https://github.com/lutris/wine/issues instead. 010c:fixme:toolhelp:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot Unimplemented: heap list snapshot 010c:fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION 010c:fixme:process:GetProcessWorkingSetSizeEx (FFFFFFFF,0032F098,0032F094,00000000): stub 010c:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (0x5f0030, 1): stub 010c:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0001007A, 005F0030): stub 0074:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (0x4403d0, 0): stub 0074:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0000000000010020, 00000000004403D0): stub 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Button" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"#32770" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Static" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"#32770" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Button" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"#32770" 0100:fixme:oleacc:find_class_data unhandled window class: L"Button" 010c:fixme:toolhelp:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot Unimplemented: heap list snapshot 01e4:fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION 01ec:fixme:wininet:query_global_option INTERNET_OPTION_PER_CONNECTION_OPTION stub

However 6.4 isnt currently hosted. So I went to https://github.com/lutris/wine/releases/tag/lutris-6.4 got Lutris 6.4 in it’s unextracted file. But I don’t know where to extract this file so when I open up Lutris then open up wine management I can have an installation prompt available and I can install Lutris 6.4 and play kh3

You can fetch a prebuilt 64-bit one from the official Gihub repo, specifically https://github.com/lutris/wine/releases/tag/lutris-6.4 ; unarchive in the correct directory as usual.

lutris and lutris-fshark (fshark might be depreciated after Lutris Wine 7.2-2) build by Lutris team and contains patches and improvement from Proton

Title says it already: Can somebody explain the differences of Lutris-Wine and Wine-GE to me? Especially because GloriousEgroll the maintainer of Proton-GE and Wine-GE also seems to be referenced in Lutris' wine builds.

I'd start with a different Wine runner first https://github.com/lutris/wine/releases you can try any of the older ones except the one for league of legends... Which is for LoL exclusively ofc

lutris-wrapper: vguo Started initial process 33920 from gamemoderun /home/rwillmore/.local/share/lutris/runners/wine/lutris-7.2-2-x86_64/bin/wine /home/rwillmore/Desktop/Vanguard EMU/Vanguard EMU/VGOEmuLauncher.exe Start monitoring process. gamemodeauto: fsync: up and running. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Lutris Wine 7.2 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please don't report bugs about it on winehq.org and use https://github.com/lutris/wine/issues instead. 010c:fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Outlined"! 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Round"! 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Sharp"! 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Two Tone"! 010c:fixme:font:find_matching_face Untranslated charset 255 010c:fixme:font:get_nearest_charset returning DEFAULT_CHARSET face->fs.fsCsb[0] = 00000000 file = L"\??\Z:\usr\share\fonts\material-icons-fonts\MaterialIconsOutlined-Regular.otf" 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Outlined"! 010c:fixme:font:find_matching_face Untranslated charset 255 010c:fixme:font:get_nearest_charset returning DEFAULT_CHARSET face->fs.fsCsb[0] = 00000000 file = L"\??\Z:\usr\share\fonts\material-icons-fonts\MaterialIconsRound-Regular.otf" 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Round"! 010c:fixme:font:find_matching_face Untranslated charset 255 010c:fixme:font:get_nearest_charset returning DEFAULT_CHARSET face->fs.fsCsb[0] = 00000000 file = L"\??\Z:\usr\share\fonts\material-icons-fonts\MaterialIconsSharp-Regular.otf" 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Sharp"! 010c:fixme:font:find_matching_face Untranslated charset 255 010c:fixme:font:get_nearest_charset returning DEFAULT_CHARSET face->fs.fsCsb[0] = 00000000 file = L"\??\Z:\usr\share\fonts\material-icons-fonts\MaterialIconsTwoTone-Regular.otf" 010c:fixme:font:freetype_set_outline_text_metrics failed to read full_nameW for font L"Material Icons Two Tone"! 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 0058:fixme:nsi:ipv6_forward_enumerate_all not implemented 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub 010c:fixme:wincodecs:jpeg_decoder_get_metadata_blocks stub

Also DLSS has pretty strict requirements in advertising, requiring nvidia logo & adverts on splash screens and give nvidia any rights to use your app in their own advertising. [0] It's certainly not "free". A completely night and day difference to FSR, which just uses MIT [1]

Lots of people online seem to believe both are "free", so the only reason why you wouldn't implement one is some back room deal. But in my experience, just getting everyone into the same room to sign off on things like that is hard.

[0] https://github.com/NVIDIA/DLSS/blob/main/LICENSE.txt

[1] https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR/blob/maste...

"IT doesn't work that way. DLSS may be a click in some Unreal Games, but custom engines? Yeah, no. You need to modify the code to implement it, which is PROHIBITED by the license Nvidia has you accept when you accept their SDK terms: https://github.com/NVIDIA/DLSS/blob/main/LICENSE.txt DLSS is not FOSS (Free and Open Source) like FSR. For comparison, FSR's license that lets you do whatever the hell you need to get it functioning in the game or improve performance: https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR/blob/master/license.txt Blame Nvidia for devs not wanting to touch non-free code and enter a legal agreement where they may be litigated down the line...for implementing a technology that SELLS Nvidia GPUs. It's literally like me threatening to sue you for bringing customers to my business. Again, blame Nvidia. By the way, they are also the one that sold you the feature, so let them be the one to implement it. I keep hearing Nvidia is a "god tier software company" but can't implement DLSS on the driver side? Somehow I don't buy it, especially when they release game-ready drivers anyway. And before someone brings up the BS argument it needs game data, anyone can find those memory addresses to get to the engine or they can ask. Considering they are Nvidia, don't think any game dev will keep silent about it or how to interface with their game if there are driver issues. EDIT: Also just so you know, XeSS is also under a similarly stupid license as DLSS XeSS License: https://github.com/intel/xess/blob/main/licenses/LICENSE.pdf Keep in mind this nugget from Intel's license: "No reverse engineering, decompilation, or disassembly..." Only issue is that games need to be DECOMPILED when DEBUGGED! "

FSR 1.0 is a simpler, open source implementation, isn't it?

Same Unity release had also included FSR (which are open-source shaders: one, two)

It’s also only part of FSR. If the point your trying to make is that FSR is just fancy lanzcos, it’s not. You can see for yourself if you’re able to read C code: https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR

I'd recommend using AMD's FSR1 instead for this. It's designed for games so it should run very fast and looks reasonably good (using Lanczos).

High quality upsampling is a shader to upscale lower render scale images into your native display resolution, for the implementation see: https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR

It goes one further too because FSR is open source so if you wanted (and knew what you were doing) you could go and look yourself https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR

Here's a rather concise explanation. And again, the source is available.

FSR source code is available on Github, so is much better documented FSR2.0.