lsp-julia
github-orgmode-tests
lsp-julia | github-orgmode-tests | |
---|---|---|
3 | 245 | |
68 | 147 | |
- | - | |
2.8 | 4.8 | |
8 months ago | 5 months ago | |
Emacs Lisp | ||
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lsp-julia
-
Excited for Julia v1.9
Btw, something that used to trip me up initially is that the julia installation being used by your lsp needs to have LanguageServer.jl installed. An excellent way around this is to precompile a sysimage of the server. Essentially, something like (REF: lsp-julia) :
-
Setting up eMacs for Julia in windows (seeking guidance)
I personally use julia-snail to use Julia with Emacs but it has less introspection than what you'd find in VSCode. Once you're familiar with that, you can use the Julia Language server with Emacs.
-
Any Julia users here to help a n00b?
I'm looking right now that the screen called by SPC h d m julia and, wow! I never saw it before. I didn't even find any mention of this on lsp-julia. Probably because this is something very basic that I don't know yet, am I right? >.< Ouch!
github-orgmode-tests
-
Ask HN: Has Anyone Trained a personal LLM using their personal notes?
- or to visualize and use it as a personal partner.
There's already a ton of open-source UIs such as Chatbot-ui[3] and Reor[4]. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Personally, I haven't been consistent enough through the years in note-taking.
So, I'm really curious to learn more about those of you who were and implemented such pipelines.
I'm sure there's a ton of really fascinating experiences.
[1] https://orgmode.org/
- Org Mode
-
From Doom to Vanilla Emacs
literate config (using ORG mode)
-
My productivity app is a never-ending .txt file
Obligatory reference to Emacs Org-Mode [1].
Author's approach is basically Org-Mode with fewer helpers.
Org-mode's power is that, at core, it's just a text file, with gradual augmentation.
Then again, Org-Mode is a tool you must install, accessible through a limited list of clients (Emacs obviously, but also VSCode), and the power of OP's approach is that it requires no external tools.
[1] https://orgmode.org
-
Show HN: Heynote – A Dedicated Scratchpad for Developers
This reminds me a lot of [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.
-
How to combine daily journal with general database of people, places, things, etc.
If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."
- github-orgmode-tests: This is a test project where you can explore how github interprets Org-mode files
-
Ask HN: Local Wysiwyg HTML Editor for Mac
Wow, no one has recommended Org mode (https://orgmode.org). I started using Emacs nearly 20 years ago specifically because of Org. I use Org for all my static sites, note taking, to-do lists and calendar. Org has a lightweight markup language that has far more features than Markdown (e.g., plain text spreadsheets!), but the markup isn't visible to the extent that Markdown is in most editors. Emacs with Org files behaves almost like a WYSIWYG editor. For example, links in Org files are clickable and their URLs aren't visible unless a cursor is hovered over them. I'm an obsessive note-taker with more than 6,000 Org files in my personal knowledge base and none of the dozens of other note-taking apps that I've evaluated comes even close to Emacs with Org. But to be fair, I create content on Linux only so support for mobile devices doesn't matter to me.
By the way, I think it's hilarious that you mentioned Dreamweaver, dv35z, because I experimented with using Dreamweaver for note-taking in the 90s! I still have a few HTML files that include notes I took back then using Dreamweaver. Needless to say, I definitely prefer Emacs with Org!
-
Think in Analog, Capture in Digital
Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].
Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it's maturity, e.g. "evergreen state").
1. https://orgmode.org/
- Welche Note taking/Wiki App nutzt ihr, falls überhaupt?
What are some alternatives?
jupyter - An interface to communicate with Jupyter kernels.
logseq - A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life.
coc.nvim - Nodejs extension host for vim & neovim, load extensions like VSCode and host language servers.
org-roam-ui - A graphical frontend for exploring your org-roam Zettelkasten
vim-julia-cell - Run Julia cells in Vim
todo.txt-cli - ☑️ A simple and extensible shell script for managing your todo.txt file.
julia-snail - An Emacs development environment for Julia
marktext - 📝A simple and elegant markdown editor, available for Linux, macOS and Windows.
julia-vim - Vim support for Julia.
Joplin - Joplin - the secure note taking and to-do app with synchronisation capabilities for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.
emacs-jupyter - emacs plug-in to run python code inside tex or markdown buffer
pandoc - Universal markup converter