lsp-bridge VS GNU Emacs

You can try `lsp-bridge`, It's async so even if your language server is slow, the worst thing is that you won't see any completion candidate but can still keep typing: https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge

you could also try lsp-bridge (https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge), I have it on my todo list.

Unfortunately, because of your personal spam posts in Emacs China , you decided to fabricate such a lengthy article to slander me and my project? Below are some user feedback links for lsp-bridge, you can take a look: https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge/issues/544 https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge/pull/557 https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge/issues/232 https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge/issues/198 https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge/issues/210 Here is my reply to you on Emacs China: https://emacs--china-org.translate.goog/t/lsp-bridge/24117/6?u=manateelazycat&\_x\_tr\_sl=auto&\_x\_tr\_tl=en&\_x\_tr\_hist=true I have been writing Emacs plugins for 18 years https://github.com/manateelazycat?tab=repositories&q=&type=source&language=emacs+lisp&sort= ， including the org-w3m.el has built-in in Emacs, and I have received countless thank-you emails. But your behavior, OP, which took malicious actions after being blocked due to a boring spam post in Emacs China, really shocked me.

So i have been trying out https://github.com/manateelazycat/lsp-bridge . the package is looking very good. But i couldn't figure out a way to run source.organizeImports code action using any of it's functions. If any of you guys have been trying it out or know already please help me out. My target is to bind a key to clean up unused imports.

gnu.org - contains everything you need to research his philosophy.

stallman.org - personal website, contains a lot of opinion, but I absolutely respect this man in all what he says.

emacs.org (redirects to https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) - his non-philosophical work, one of two mainstream console text editors.

Forever, there was a file included in stock Emacs, `spook.el`, which could be hooked up to automatically add random strings of "interesting" keywords to each of your email or Usenet messages (in signatures, or in headers like `X-Spook`).

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Ma...

Looks like copyright date of 1988:

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/play/...

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/etc/spook....

Try `M-x spook RET` in an Emacs buffer.

If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."

Emacs: winget install GNU.Emacs

The whole cl-lib thing is a total disaster:

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/emacs...

They added cl- as a prefix to each Common Lisp symbol.

FIRST is now called cl-first, CAAAR is now cl-caaar .

I would really prefer if GNU Emacs removes all Common Lisp functionality, instead of creating this really wacky stuff, with discussions about this topic every year.

Never too late to try! Take your time. Emacs will outlive us all. https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

GNU Emacs is a versatile, open-source text editor that offers extensibility and customization—a sort of self-documenting real-time display editor. Our thanks for the suggestion go to CartanAnnullator.

Emacs

Their DEFUN and DEFVAR macros for example let us define a function or a variable that will be available as a Lisp function, and can be used as an ordinary C function from the C code. Emacs is written in pure C99 language and works with both GCC and Clang I believe. We can just define a C function via macro, and it is auto exported and made available to Lisp. For example my first patch to Emacs was for this function (we added "count" argument to make it possible to skip enumerating files in a directory for the case when user code is just interesting if a directory is empty or not):